Prayers for +Nikon of Boston

BOSTON, MA (OCA) – Prayers are requested for the ongoing health of His Grace, Bishop Nikon of Boston, New England and the Albanian Archdiocese, who recently underwent surgery to remove a very small tumor in close proximity to his vocal cords.
Bishop Nikon will undergo several weeks of radiation, during which he will curtail some of his previously scheduled visitations.
Archpriests Arthur Liolin and John Kreta, Chancellors of the Albanian Archdiocese and Diocese of New England respectively, reported that Bishop Nikon wishes to stress how positive he is about the results of recent tests, while requesting the faithful to keep him and those who are guiding his care and treatment in their prayers.
Bishop Nikon may be contacted at PO Box 149, Southbridge, MA 01550.

The Divine Liturgy ~ The Entrance Prayers

In my last post, I gave an overview of the Divine Liturgy and briefly listed some of the elements.  One commenter pointed out that more Western Rite Liturgies exists.  I list only the ones that are approved for use in the US by the Antiochian Archdiocese.  If you are interested in the Liturgies of the Western Rite there are many good articles available.  As time permits, I will add entries on the Liturgies of the Western Rite.

Today I will look at the Entrance Prayers.  These are the prayers said by the priest and deacon prior to their entrance into the Holy Place for the preparation.  The Bishop will also say these prayers upon his entrance to the church.  In the Romanian tradition, all of the priests that will serve the Liturgy says these prayers in other traditions only the principal celebrant will say them.  The faithful usually do not see, or hear these prayers, as they are said long before they arrive at the church.

The rubrics of these prayers, in the Liturgy Book that I use translated by the Romanian Episcopate begin with these words to the priest:

In preparation for the Divine Liturgy, the priest must be reconciled to all men, have a pure heart and fast from the preceding evening.  When the time comes, the priest and the deacon enter the church, and standing in the center, bow three times toward the Holy Table and begin the prayers.
The usual prayers are then said;
Blessed is our God…

Heavenly King…
Holy God…
Glory to the Father…
All-holy Trinity…
Our Father…

Then this prayer:

Have mercy on us, Lord, have mercy on us; we sinners, your servants incapable of response offer you as master this supplication: have mercy on us.

Lord, have mercy on us for we hope in you.  Do not be angry with us, do not remember our transgressions, but, being merciful, look on us and deliver us from our enemies.  For you are our God, and we are your people, we are all the work of your hands, and we call your name.
Then go before the Icon of the Savior and say:

We venerate your most pure image, O good one, asking forgiveness for our transgressions, Christ God.  For of your own free will you ascended the cross in the flesh to free us, your creation, from servitude to the enemy.  Therefore, we gratefully cry out to you:  You have filled all things with joy, O our Savior,  you that came to save the world.
The go before the Icon of the Theotokos and say:

O Birthgiver of God, font of mercy, make us worthy of your compassion.  Look favorably on us sinful people.  Again show forth your power, as always, for we hope in you and we cry out to you as Gabriel chief leader of the bodiless hosts once did: Rejoice!
Returning to the center of the Church they say:

Lord stretch out your hand from the heights of your dwelling place and strengthen me for your service which is about to begin, so that, blameless, I may stand before fearful throne and fulfill the bloodless oblation.  For yours is the power and the glory unto ages of ages.  Amen

Entering the Sanctuary through the door on the right they say:

I will enter your house, I will worship toward your holy temple in fear of you.  Lead me, O Lord, in your righteousness because of my enemies; make my way straight before you.
After entering the altar, they go before the holy table, and make two bows.  The priest kisses the Holy Gospel Book, the cross and the holy table and the deacon kisses the edge of the holy table.  The they make one bow more, and go behind the holy table and facing the high place, they say three times:

O God, cleanse me a sinner and have mercy on me.
Then they vest for the Liturgy

Next time the Vesting prayers and a description of the vestments.

The Divine Liturgy ~ An Explanation

Over the next few days, I will be posting on elements of the Divine Liturgy of the Orthodox Church.  One thing that one needs to know, is that there is more to the Divine Liturgy then what one sees when one comes to Church.  I will attempt to break this apart and explain the different sections.  Please ask any questions that you may have along the way.

Liturgical Day ~ Unlike the Western Church, the Liturgical Day for the Orthodox begins at Sundown.  Vespers is the first Liturgy of the day and is the principle evening service.  Here at St. Michael we celebrate Vespers on Saturday evening in preparation for the Sunday Liturgy.  The Vespers service is meant to remind us of the Old Testament period, the creation of the world, the first human beings fall into sin, of their expulsion from Paradise, their repentance and prayer for salvation, the hope of mankind in accordance with the promise of God for a Saviour and ending with the fulfillment of that promise. (Looks like I need a post just on Vespers!)

One note here, Vespers, Orthros, and Divine Liturgy are one seamless service.  The Sunday Liturgy really begins with Vespers on Saturday night and continues through the Orthros service on Sunday morning.  The Divine Liturgy is not the only service on Sunday.

Orthros or Matins in the most complex of the daily cycle of services.  It is celebrated in the morning prior to Divine Liturgy unless it is served as part of the vigil.  Sunday Orthros, if celebrated in its entirety, can last up to three hours.  Here at St. Michael we serve a modified version of this service.

The Divine Liturgy is the primary worship service of the Orthodox Church.  Celebrated on Sunday and other feast days.  Parish Churches do not usually serve the Divine Liturgy on a Daily bases.  Some monasteries will celebrate a daily Divine Liturgy but it is left to the monastery to make that decision.

The Orthodox Church has three primary Divine Liturgies celebrated at different times during the year.  The Liturgy of St. John Chrysostom is the Liturgy most people will be familiar with.  The Liturgy of St. Basil the Great is used the Sundays of Great Lent and other appointed times, and the Liturgy of the Presanctified Gifts is used weekdays during Great Lent.  I will post on each of these Liturgies as time permits.

There are other Liturgies approved for use in the Church.  The Liturgy of St. James (used on the feast day of St. James) as well as the Liturgy of St. Mark (used on the feast of St. Mark).  There are two liturgies approved for use on the Western Rite, the Liturgy of St. Gregory and the Liturgy of St. Tikhon.

At the heart of the Liturgy is the Eucharist.  The Church teaches that the gifts truly become the body and blood of Jesus Christ, but it has never dogmatized a particular formula for describing this transformation.

Each Orthodox Christian should attend the Liturgy on every Sunday as well as feast days but we do not do this out of obligation but rather as a privilege.  We consider ourselves to be part of the one great family of Christ – the Church – that is made up of both the living and the dead.  By attending the Holy Services we enter into the glorious company of the saints.  Unworthy though we may be our Father in Heaven welcomes us.

When entering the church (before the services has started by the way) the common practice is to light candles in memory of the living and the dead and then the Icons are venerated.  Private prayers are then said and one joins the community in the corporate worship.  Liturgy is not a time for private prayers or devotion as it is the work of all the people.  Participation is required as Liturgy is not theater, you are not there to be entertained.

Prior to the celebration of the Divine Liturgy the priest will say the Entrance Prayers and that will be the subject of the next post.

Mosque at Ground Zero

I have not commented on this up to this point but now I think I need too.  Let me start by saying that I do not think that the proposed center should be allowed to be built near “ground zero” but I think the entire situation has been blown way out of proportion.

First off like it or not we have people in this country who follow Islam and like it or not we also have religious freedom in this country.  These are facts.  The other fact is this is, for the most part, not a Mosque as we think of it but more of a Islamic Center with a worship space in it.  And it is being put in a building that already exists and it is, as far as I can tell, two blocks from “ground zero”  Again I don’t think it should be there because of the symbolism of the whole thing.

Several years ago in Belmont, Massachusetts the Mormons wanted to build one of their Temples.  They are all built the same and have very large towers with a golden angel on the top.  It took years to get the necessary approval for this to be built.  It came down to the people in the town did not want the Mormons there.  Well that is discrimination and that is not right.  I hate to say this but not all Muslims are terrorists!

At the base of one of the Towers, was St. Nicholas Greek Orthodox Church.  A very old Church that stood there for years.  It was completely destroyed when the towers came down.  The parish has been trying to rebuild the church low these many years and has been negotiating with the Port Authority.  It seems that talk have broken down, and depending on who you talk too, you get a different story of why the talks broke down.  Here is a story from FoxNews that will bring you up to date.  There is no need for me to go into all the details you can read them yourself.

Several weeks ago, a candidate for Congress from New York who is Greek started to make hay about the fact that the Mosque got approval but they church has been denied permission to build.  That is not exactly the case.  The church has been denied the right to build a dome that will rise above the proposed monument to the victims of 9/11.  Nothing can be higher than the monument, the same regulation that exists in Washington, DC by the way.  The Mosque is not at the site and cannot even be seen from the site.  Again I am against building the thing, but lets tell the truth and not just use emotions to rally people to the cause.

In my opinion what needs to happen is everyone needs to take a deep breath and step back a little on this one.  Should the church be rebuilt? Yes.  Should the Islamic Center be built? No.  This is a very complex issue.  Nothing will happen overnight so there is time to go back to the table and talk.

UPDATE:  It was pointed out to me that I did not explain why I am opposed to this being built.  My objection and I will admit it is a little flimsy, is on the grounds of perception.  I agree that they, as well as any religion, has the right to build a church, temple, mosque wherever they want as long as it is within the laws of the place they wish to build.  I support the right of anyone to practice whatever religion they wish to practice even if it goes against my very beliefs.  I also support peoples right to oppose building this, another right we have in this country.  So for me its the symbolism more than anything else.  Kind of light I know and maybe after more thought and prayer I would change that decision.  But I think this will be a lightening rod for people and it might be better to be built in another location.  I would ask this question.  Why this place?  Why right there?

Seek God Above All

Imagine that there is nothing else in front of your eyes – as though you were not among mankind – because you are seeing nothing else but God, for God is the entire reason for your way of life.  John the Solitary

Saint Benedict’s Rule indicates that the sole purpose for the monastic vocation is to seek God above all.  In the monastery or hermitage, the monk must not waste time or energy seeking human approval.  Only God’s approval matters.  Saint Benedict measures the advances a monk makes in his spiritual quest by the level of detachment from earthly approvals, popularity, contests, and especially by the degree of the monk’s self-surrender into the Father’s loving hands.  For Saint Benedict, to seek God alone means to abandon one’s former life completely and to entrust oneself to the Father’s will as Jesus did.  While Jesus was making his entrance into our world, he uttered: “Behold, I come to do your will.”  During his earthly days he prayed daily, humbly: “Your will be done on earth as in heaven.”

There is a certain pedagogy in Benedict’s Rule.  He wishes to show the monk that, just as Jesus lived for God alone, the monk must act likewise in his daily monastic search.  After all, the disciple is no greater than the master.  This implies that the example of the master  defines the path the disciple must follow.  All authentic monastic life is thoroughly theocentric.  Just as Jesus committed his life radically to God alone, even to the point of death on the cross, so must the monk commit himself to a life of full communion with God in all times and in all places.  Prayer is the monk’s daily tool in his search for fullness of life with God.  The Holy Spirit, through continual prayer, guides the heart of the monk towards the living waters of God’s love.  Only when we begin to love God as he really is, above all things, do we discover the true joy that can replenish all the desires of the human heart.  No other but God can fully satisfy the human Heart.

Blessings of the Daily.  A Monastic Book of Days.  Brother Victor-Antoine d’Avila-Latourette

Book Review ~ Short Trip to the Edge

Several months ago, shortly after my tonsure into the Orthodox Monastic Life, a very good priest friend of mine gave me a book about a poet who went on a search to Mount Athos, the Holy Island off the coast of Greece.
Scott Cairns takes his readers on the journey with him as he seeks to find a spiritual father on the Holy Mountain to help him with the Jesus Prayer.  Short Trip to the Edge is the book he wrote and the book  my priest friend gave me.

If you are unfamiliar with the Holy Mountain this would be a great book to start with.  Professor Cairns describes the monasteries, some of which have existed since the early days of Christianity, so explicitly it makes you feel like to are trekking the mountain roads with him.  You can almost smell the incense during the Orthros Services and if you listen close you can hear the monks chanting.

This book is not a theological work or a work on the necessity of prayer but is one man’s search of enlightenment on the Holy Mountain.  The monks and lay people he meets take him on his own journey as he takes the reader on his.  The realization is that the search continues on and never really comes to an end.  ones does not need to travel to the Holy Mountain to find a spiritual father but it is a good place to start.

The book is an easy read and is responsible for many sleepless nights as I could not put this book down as each page I turned was another step on the paths of the Holy Mountain.  I would highly recommend this book to anyone who is in search of anything.

Scott Cairns teaches modern and contemporary American literature and creative writing at the University of Missouri. He is an accomplished poet whose writing has appeared in The Atlantic Monthly, The Paris Review, The New Republic, Books & Culture, and Image. He was recently named a Guggenheim Fellow.

Dr. Cairns hosts a podcast on Ancient Faith Radio called Flesh Becomes Word where he reads his poetry and that of other Orthodox poets.

Because a Young Girl Said Yes

Yesterday, the Orthodox Church celebrated the feast of the Dormition of the Theotokos. This is one of the twelve great feasts of the Orthodox Church and commemorates the falling asleep of the Mother of God.
Mary is one of the most misunderstood figures in Church history. We have very little by way of Scriptural reference of her life prior to the Annunciation and we have no scriptural references on her death. We only have tradition and the faith of the Church to guide us.
First a little about the feast itself. This feast is similar in many ways to the Roman Catholic feast of the Assumption. In fact they are celebrated on the same day. According to our Orthodox Tradition, Mary died like all humanity, as we say in the Orthodox Church she “fell asleep.” She died as all of us will, not “voluntarily” as her Son, but like all humans our time will come when our earthly body gives out. The Apostles, save St. Thomas, were miraculously summoned to this event and were present when she died and was buried.
Thomas arrived a few days latter and desiring to see her one more time asked to be taken to the place of her burial. She was not there and this is considered to be the “first fruits” of the resurrection of all the faithful that will happen at the Second Coming of Christ.
So why do the Orthodox and the Roman Catholics honor Mary as we do? Well quite frankly it is because of the title of this post, because a young girl said yes!
Scripture tells us that the Angel Gabriel appeared to Mary and asked her to give birth to Jesus. Tradition tells us that she was a young girl and not wise in the ways of the world and asked the Angel how this would happen since she does not know man. In the end Mary says yes to the Angel. St. Nicholas Cabasilas tell us that if Mary, in her obedience, had not offered her freedom to God – had she not said yes to God- God would not have been able to become incarnate. In other words, if this young girl had not said yes, Jesus would not have been born.
Mary gave her consent to the request of the Angel in her freedom, the freedom that we all have. God did not “force himself” on her because once God have freedom to His creation He would not have been able to violate this. Mary said yes out of her freedom and her love for God.
The Fathers of the Church consider Mary to be a cause of Salvation in the sense that she gave birth to the savior, source of life because she is the Mother of Life. Her consent to become the vehicle for the Incarnation was recognized as a redemptive act, not simply an act of singular felicity undoing the devastation achieved by Eve. For this reason Mary is considered the Second Eve.
Just as sin came into the world through the disobedience of the First Eve, the Redemption of the world came through the Second Eve, Mary through the submission to the will of God. He consent had exceptional moral value; it was an act of uncommon obedience. The Second Eve, according to St. Irenaeus, cooperated with God and liberates humanity from that death which the First Eve’s collusion with Satan had caused.
The portrait of Mary presented by Luke is one of perfection directly related to God. The word “kecharitomene” (full of grace) (Lk. 1:28) immediately places her on a higher level than Zachariah and Elizabeth, who are righteous in the Old Testament sense. She is God’s favored one. She has found favor with the Lord (Lk. 1:30); her child can be called Holy (Lk. 1:35); she is blessed among women, blessed because she has believed (Lk. 1:42, 45); all ages will recognize her blessing (Lk. 2:19 51). In Luke’s Theology she is God’s people at prayer, pilgrimage to the Temple, preeminent among the poor of the Lord, capable of sanctifying others (Lk. 1:44), inspiring awe in her elders, Symeon and Elizabeth.
I believe there is some misunderstanding of the Orthodox/Roman Catholic position of Mary in the Church. We do not worship Mary, but we honor her. She is considered, “more honorable then the Cherubim and more glorious than the Seraphim.” Epiphanius said, “Though Mary is remarkably good, though she is holy, though she is to be held in honor, still she is not to be adored.”
In Orthodox Iconography Mary is never depicted alone she is always holding her Son and pointing toward Him as the Way. We do not honor Mary apart from the Salvific work of her Son but honor her for the part she played in it. Again, if she had not said yes, the rest would not have been able to happen.
In Orthodox Theology the salvation of the humanity is primarily an act of God. God invites his Creation to be in communion with Him, in order that He might share His divine glory with His creation. This communion becomes an “ontological” reality through the Incarnation of the Word of God in Jesus Christ. The Creator is united with His Creation. The divine is united with the human. This unity is the beginning of new life for the world. Through this Incarnation human nature is restored into a fellowship with God which had been damaged by the fall. Mary, expressing the desire of the human race to be saved, accepted obediently God’s love and therefore participates actively in the mystery of the Incarnation. The answer of Mary to the Archangels Annunciation resolves the tragedy of fallen humanity.
The Orthodox Church does not accept the idea that the Holy Virgin was exempted from the lot of the rest of fallen humanity. It is not by virtue of privilege received at the moment of her conception by her parents that we venerate the Mother of God more than any other created being. She was not, at the moment of the Annunciation, in a state the same as that of Eve before the Fall. Mary’s unique election does not separate her from the rest of humanity, from all her fathers, mothers, brothers and sisters, whether saints or sinners, but she represents the best parts. She was not placed above history in order to serve a special divine decree, but realized her unique vocation while in the “chains of history,” sharing the common destiny of all humanity awaiting salvation. The Mother of God, before the day of Pentecost, before the Church, still belonged to the humanity of the Old Testament, to those who waited for “the promise of the Father,” expecting to be baptized with the Holy Spirit (Acts 1:4-5).
In the end, Mary is honored in the Church not for who she was but for what she did. Mary is the example for all of us of obedience to God’s call on our life. Because this young, poor girl said yes to God, the world was changed forever.(some of the material for this post came from class notes from a Dogmatic Theology class in Seminary at Holy Cross Greek Orthodox School of Theology with Fr. Emmanuel Clapsis.)

Encyclopedia of Eastern Orthodox Christianity

“With a combination of essay-length and short entries written by a team of leading religious experts, the two-volume Encyclopedia of Eastern Orthodoxy offers the most comprehensive guide to the cultural and intellectual world of Eastern Orthodox Christianity available in English today.
•An outstanding reference work providing the first English language multi-volume account of the key historical, liturgical, doctrinal features of Eastern Orthodoxy, including the Non-Chalcedonian churches
•Explores of the major traditions of Eastern Orthodoxy in detail, including the Armenian, Byzantine, Coptic, Ethiopic, Slavic, Romanian, Syriac churches
•Uniquely comprehensive, it is edited by one of the leading scholars in the field and provides authoritative but accessible articles by a range of top international academics and Orthodox figures
•Spans the period from Late Antiquity to the present, encompassing subjects including history, theology, liturgy, monasticism, sacramentology, canon law, philosophy, folk culture, architecture, archaeology, martyrology, hagiography, all alongside a large and generously detailed prosopography
•Structured alphabetically and topically cross-indexed, with entries ranging from 100 to 6,000 words
John Anthony McGuckin, editor, is Nielsen Professor of Early Church History at Union Theological Seminary, and Professor of Byzantine Christian Studies at Columbia University in New York. A Stavrofor priest of the Romanian Orthodox Church in America, Professor McGuckin is the author of more than twenty books on religious and historical themes, including The Orthodox Church (Wiley-Blackwell, 2008), and is considered one of the leading experts of the early Christian and Eastern Orthodox tradition writing in English today.”

13 August ~ Saint Tikhon of Zadonsk

Saint Tikhon of Zadonsk, Bishop of Voronezh (in the world Timothy), was born in the year 1724 in the village of Korotsk in the Novgorod diocese, into the family of the cantor Sabellius Kirillov. (A new family name, Sokolov, was given him afterwards by the head of the Novgorod seminary). His father died when Timothy was a young child, leaving the family in such poverty that his mother was barely able to make ends meet. She wanted to give him to be raised by a neighbor, a coachman, since there was nothing with which to feed the family, but his brother Peter would not permit this. Timothy often worked a whole day with the peasants for a single piece of black bread.

As a thirteen-year-old boy, he was sent to a clergy school near the Novgorod archbishop’s home, and earned his keep by working with the vegetable gardeners. In 1740, he was accepted under a state grant set up for the Novgorod seminary. The youth excelled at his studies. Upon finishing seminary in 1754, he became a teacher there, first in Greek, and later in Rhetoric and Philosophy. In the year 1758, he was tonsured with the name Tikhon. In that same year they appointed him to be prefect of the seminary.

In 1759, they transferred him to Tver, elevating him to be archimandrite of the Zheltikov monastery. Later, they appointed him rector of the Tver seminary and, at the same time, head of the Otroch monastery.

His election as bishop was providential. Metropolitan Demetrius, the presiding member of the Holy Synod, had intended to transfer the young archimandrite to the Trinity-Sergiev Lavra. On the day of Pascha, at Peterburg, Archimandrite Tikhon was one of eight candidates being considered for selection as vicar-bishop for Novogorod. The lot fell on him three times.

On the same day, during the Cherubic Hymn, Bishop Athanasius of Tver, without realizing it, commemorated him as a bishop while cutting out particles from the prosphora at the Table of Oblation. On May 13, 1761 he was consecrated Bishop of Keksgolma and Ladoga (i.e., a vicar bishop of the Novgorod diocese).

In 1763, St Tikhon was transferred to the See of Voronezh. During the four and a half years that he administered the Voronezh diocese, St Tikhon provided constant edification, both by his life and by his numerous pastoral guidances and soul-saving books. He wrote a whole series of works for pastors:

Concerning the Seven Holy Mysteries

A Supplement to the Priestly Office

Concerning the Mystery of Repentance

An Instruction Concerning Marriage

The saint considered it essential that each priest, deacon and monk have a New Testament, and that he should read it daily. In an Encyclical, he called on pastors to perform the Holy Mysteries with reverence, with the fear of God, and love for one’s neighbor. (An Explanation of Christian Duties was often republished in Moscow and Peterburg during the eighteenth century).

At Voronezh the saint eradicated an ancient pagan custom, the celebration in honor of Yarila (a pagan god associated with the fertility of grain and cattle). In the outlying districts where military units of the Don Cossacks were dispersed, he formed a missionary commission to restore sectarians to the Orthodox Church.

In 1765, St Tikhon transformed the Voronezh Slavic-Latin school into a seminary. He invited experienced instructors from Kiev and Kharkhov, and planned the courses for it. He exerted much attention and effort to build up both the churches and the school, and to guide pastors to understand the need for education.

The saint was unflagging in his efforts to administer the vast diocese, and he often spent nights without sleep. In 1767, poor health compelled him to give up running the diocese and withdraw for rest to the Tolshevsk monastery, at a distance 40 versts from Voronezh.

In 1769, the saint transferred to the monastery of the Theotokos in the city of Zadonsk. Having settled into this monastery, St Tikhon became a great teacher of the Christian life. With deep wisdom he set forth the ideal of true monasticism in his Rule of Monastic Living and his Guidances to Turn from the Vanity of the World, and in his own life he fulfilled this ideal. He kept strictly to the precepts of the Church. Zealously (almost daily) he visited the temple of God, and he often sang and read in the choir. In time, out of humility, he altogether ceased participating and serving, but merely stood in the altar, reverently making the Sign of the Cross over himself. He loved to read the Lives of the Saints and the works of the holy Fathers. He knew The Psalter by heart, and he usually read or sang the Psalms on his journeys.

The saint underwent much tribulation because he had to leave his flock. When he recovered his health, he thought about returning to the Novgorod diocese, where Metropolitan Gabriel had invited him to head the Iveron Vallaisk monastery. But when his cell-attendant mentioned this to the Elder Aaron, he declared: “Are you mad? The Mother of God does not direct him to move away from here.” The cell-attendant conveyed this to His Grace.

“If that is so,” said the saint “I shall not move away from here,” and he tore up the invitation. Sometimes he journeyed to the village of Lipovka, where he celebrated church services at the Bekhteev house. The saint journeyed also to the Tolshev monastery, which he loved for its solitude.

The fruition of all his spiritual life were the books that the saint wrote while in retirement: A SPIRITUAL TREASURY, GATHERED FROM THE WORLD (1770), and ON TRUE CHRISTIANITY (1776).

The saint lived in very simple circumstances: he slept on straw, covered by a sheepskin coat. His humility was so great that he paid no attention to the workers who laughed at him as he walked about the monastery, pretending that he did not hear it. He used to say, “It is pleasing to God that even the monastery workers mock me, and I deserve it because of my sins.” He often said, “Forgiveness is better than revenge.”

Once, a fool named Kamenev struck the saint on the cheek saying, “Don’t be so haughty” The saint, accepting this with gratitude, gave the fool three kopeks every day for the rest of his life.

All his life the saint “in troubles, and sorrows, and insults… joyfully endured, mindful that there can be no crown without the victory, nor victory without effort, nor effort without struggle, nor struggle without enemies” (Ode 6 of the Canon).

Strict towards himself, the saint was indulgent towards others. On the Friday before Palm Sunday, he entered the cell of his friend the schemamonk Metrophanes, and he saw him at table together with Cosmas Ignatievich, of whom he was also fond. There was fish on the table, and his friends became upset (Fish is not permitted during Lent, except for Feast days). The saint said, “Sit down, for I know you. Love is higher than fasting.” To further calm them, he ate some of their fish soup.

He especially loved the common folk, and comforted them in their grievous lot, interceding with the landowners, and moving them to compassion. He gave away his pension, and gifts from admirers, to the poor.

By his deeds of self-denial and love of soul, the saint advanced in contemplation of Heaven and foresaw the future. In 1778, he had a vision in his sleep: the Mother of God stood in the clouds, and near Her were the Apostles Peter and Paul. On bended knees, the saint prayed to the All-Pure Virgin for the peace of the whole world. The Apostle Paul loudly exclaimed: “When they shall say, peace and safety; then sudden destruction will come upon them” (I Thess. 5:3). The saint fell asleep in trembling and in tears. The following year, he again saw the Mother of God in the air and several people near Her. The saint knelt down, and near him four others in white garments also fell to their knees. The saint entreated the All-Pure Virgin for someone, that She would not leave him (the saint did not tell his cell-attendant who the four people were, nor for whom the request was made). She answered, “Let it be as you ask.”

St Tikhon prophesied much about the future, particularly the victory of Russia over the French in 1812. More than once they saw the saint in spiritual rapture, with a transformed and luminous face, but he forbade them to speak about this.

For three years before his repose he prayed each day, “Tell me, O Lord, of my end.” And a quiet voice in the morning dawn said, “It will be on a Sunday.” In that same year, he saw in a dream a beautiful meadow with wondrous palaces upon it. He wanted to go inside, but they said to him: “In three years, you may enter. For now, continue your labors.” After this the saint secluded himself in his cell and admitted only a few friends.

Both clothing and a grave were prepared for the time of his death. He often came to weep over his coffin, while standing hidden from people in a closet. A year and three months before his death, in a vivid dream, it seemed to the saint that he was standing in the monastery church. A priest of his acquaintance was carrying the Divine Infant, covered with a veil, out of the altar through the Royal Doors. The saint approached and kissed the Infant on the right cheek, and he felt himself stricken on the left. Awakening, the saint sensed a numbness in his left cheek, his left leg, and a trembling in his left hand. He accepted this illness with joy.

Shortly before his death, the saint saw in a dream a high and twisting ladder and he heard a command to climb it. “At first, I was afraid because of weakness,” he told his friend Cosmas. “But when I started to go climb, the people standing around the ladder lifted me higher and higher, up to the very clouds.”

“The ladder,” said Cosmas, “is the way to the Heavenly Kingdom. Those who helped were those you have helped by your advice, and they remember you.” The saint said with tears, “I thought so, too. I feel that my end is near.” He frequently received the Holy Mysteries during his illness.

St Tikhon died, as was revealed to him, on Sunday August 13, 1783, at the age of fifty-nine. The first uncovering of his relics occurred on May 14, 1846.

Saint Tikhon’s glorification took place on Sunday August 13, 1861.

From oca.org

Criticizing the Government

I have always been fascinated by government, government at all levels. I am involved in local government on several levels and feel that it is our civic duty to be involved and informed regardless of your point of view.

I watch the Southbridge Town Council meeting on the local cable station this past Monday night to see what was going on. I will admit I don’t always watch but I watch this past Monday because I was up for an appointment to a subcommittee dealing with education and human service.

One of the highlights of Council meetings is what we call Citizen forum. This is a time for residents of the Town to speak on any issue not on that nights agenda. It is always fascinating to watch the folks speak their concerns. I congratulate anyone who has the gumption to stand up in public and speak. As someone who does this for a living I know how hard it is.

Last Monday, two residents spoke about the way a local blog, not this one by the way, treats them and other members of Town Government. The author of the blog, who I went to college with and would consider a friend, is an appointed member of a board in town dealing with revisions to how the town operates. I will not go into all of the details as they are not relevant to the topic. On this blog the author has called for the resignation of the Town Manager. He has from time to time, pushed the envelope and I have spoken to him privately about this. Gentle correction from a friend.

The one who spoke asked that this blog, and all other none Town websites be removed as links from the Town Website. Okay I might agree with this. But they are asking they be removed because he is critical of the Town. Well I don’t feel that is a good enough reason. Being critical of the government is part of our job. The loyal opposition has always been important. If it was not for the loyal opposition our Country might not even exists. John and Samuel Adams wrote papers, blogs of their day if you will, very critical of the government whilst serving in that very government! Members of Congress are often very critical of the way our Government runs and the entire British political system is based on the opposition speaking out!

We have freedom of speech in this country and I believe we hold it very dear. The same freedom of speech allowed the two citizens to speak at the Council meeting allows the blogger to write what he does. Does this freedom have responsibility? Yes. We need to be careful of the words we use. If you don’t like what they write about you defend your position or just ignore it. We have 17,000 people in this town and I would be surprised if 1% of that number reads any of the blogs.

Opposition to the government is extremely important and we need to keep it up, we need to be respectful and cautious, but we need to keep it up.

error: Content is protected !!