Greek church protests pre-trial detention of Abbot Efraim

Abbot Efraim
The autocephalous Orthodox Church of Greece has called for the release of Abbot Efraim, the head of the Vatopedi Monastery in Mount Athos, who is currently under arrest on real estate fraud charges, the church’s Holy Synod said on Thursday.
“Our church respects rulings by justice and would not like to interfere in its responsibility sphere… Nevertheless, together with many believers, the church expresses sympathy of all its members to the embattled abbot, and… hopes the possibility of his release from custody will be reconsidered,” it said.
The Cypriot-born 56-year-old Abbot Efraim is accused of involvement in a criminal scheme under which the Greek government swapped cheap farmland for costly Athens real estate in favor of the Vatopedi Monastery. He says he is not guilty.
The head of the Church of Greece, Ieronymos II, Archbishop of Athens and All Greece, plans to visit Efraim in jail.
On December 29, the head of the Russian Orthodox Church, Patriarch Kirill of Moscow and All Russia, urged Greek President Karolos Papoulias to release Efraim, who was arrested on December 24.
In November, Efraim led a Vatopedi Monastery delegation that brought one of the main Christian relics, a belt of the Virgin Mary, to Russia for the first time in history.
The arrest of Efraim has sparked a diplomatic row between Moscow and Athens.
The Church of Greece is one of the fourteen autocephalous churches in the Orthodox Christian community. Mount Athos is within the jurisdiction of another autocephalous church in Greece, the Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople.
The Ecumenical Patriarchate denounced the Russian Orthodox Church’s interference in the case.
A number of Greek legal experts have questioned whether the police actions on self-governed Mount Athos were legal. Athos is part of Greek territory. Its monks are Greek citizens, but a special warrant from the prosecutor’s office is required to arrest a person on Athos.

Source

The Art of Listening

The very first line that St. Benedict wrote in his rule for monastics is “listen.” All of the literature on prayer instructs us that half of prayer is listening. When the priest faces the people before the reading of the Holy Gospel he bids them, “Let us listen to the Holy Gospel.”
But what about listening in our personal relationships or ministry? How are we truly to listen to people?
Here are five hints that come from the book, “Skills with People” by Les Giblin.
1. Look at the person who is talking. Listen with your eyes as well as your ears; keep looking as long as they are talking. Anybody worth listening to is worth looking at.
2. Lean toward the speaker and listen intently. Appear as if you don’t want to miss a single word. There is a tendency to lean toward the interesting talker and away from the not-so-interesting ones.
3. Ask Questions. This lets the person who is talking know you are listening. Asking questions is a high form of flattery. Questions can be simple as: What happened then? Then what did you do?
4. Stick to the speaker’s subject and don’t interrupt. Don’t change subjects on a person until they are finished, no matter how anxious you are to get started on a new one.
5. Use the speaker’s words – “you” and “your.” If you use “I, me, my, mine” you are switching the focus from the speaker to yourself. That is talking, not listening.
“These five rules are nothing more than courtesy. Never will courtesy pay off for you so much as it will in listening.”

12 January ~ St. Benedict Biscop

Abbot of St. Augustine’s, Canterbury, Abbot of Wearmouth, Abbot of Jarrow. Died: 12th January AD 689 at Wearmouth, Co Durham.
Biscop Baducing was born in Northumbria in AD 628, of a noble English family. When quite a young man, he stood high in the Royal favour and was rewarded for his services to King Oswiu by the gift of a possession in land suitable to his rank…
But, it would seem, to the astonishment of King and courtiers alike, when he was only twenty-five, and had all bright prospects opening out before him, “he lightly esteemed this transitory inheritance in order that he might obtain that which is eternal; he despised the warfare of this World, with its corruptible rewards, that he might be the soldier of the true King, and be thought worthy to possess an everlasting kingdom in the heavenly city. He forsook home, kindred and country for the sake of Christ and his gospel, that he might receive an hundredfold and possess the life which is eternal.”
This was in AD 653, just at the time that St. Wilfred (the Elder) had determined to leave his country for his first visit to Rome and, as his close friend, Biscop hailed with joy the opportunity to accompany him. Thus, the two friends started off together; but when Wilfred was detained at Lyons, Biscop hastened onwards without him, “being anxious personally to visit and worship at the places in which were deposited even the bodies of the blessed Apostles, towards whom it had always been his wont to feel an ardent devotion.”
After no long time, Biscop returned to his own country, full of fervour and enthusiasm, inspired by all he had heard and seen in his travels, and from this time onward his life was filled with perpetual journeys backwards and forwards between England and Rome; journeys not lightly or idly undertaken, but each with its definite purpose and each taken for the good of the English Church. Twelve years after his first visit, Biscop returned again, accompanied by Prince Alchfrith, and “on this,” says Bede, “as on the former occasion, he imbibed the sweets of no small amount of salutary learning.” After a stay of some few months, he started on his homeward journey, but stopped short at Lerins, an island off the south coast of France, where there stood the far-famed monastery of St. Honorat. Here Biscop went through a course of instruction and took upon him the vows of a monastic life. Two years were spent in seclusion and then once more, this time under the name of Benedict, he set out for Rome and paid his third visit to the Papal see.
It was just at this time that Pope Vitalian, in compliance with a request of the two chief English kings, was in the process of sending the great Archbishop Theodore to Britain. Being a Greek however, he was in need of someone who might act as his interpreter and explain to him the customs of the English nation. And who so well suited for this as Benedict, most fortunately just at that time in Rome? Accordingly, the Pope, “observing that the venerable Benedict was a man of a mind fraught with wisdom, perseverance, religion and nobleness, entrusted to his care the bishop whom he had ordained, together with all his party; and enjoined him to abandon the pilgrimage which he had undertaken for Christ’s sake, and out of regard to a higher advantage, to return homewards to introduce into England that teacher of the truth whom it had so earnestly sought after; to whom he might become both a guide on the journey, and an interpreter in his teaching after his arrival.” Benedict, we are told, did as he was commanded and, together, the two arrived in Kent, where they were most cordially received.
Theodore ascended the throne of the archiepiscopal see, while Benedict, at his request, undertook the government of the monastery of St. Peter and St. Paul (St. Augustine’s) in the same city. Here Benedict laboured for two years, at the end of which the indefatigable traveller paid a fourth visit to Rome, “with his usual good success,” says Bede. England was at that time behind the countries of the continent, both in arts and in literature, and Benedict had probably felt the lack of books from which to teach the scholars whom he gathered around him at Canterbury. He undertook this journey for the purpose of supplying the want he had experienced. Nor was his journey in vain, “he brought back with him no inconsiderable number of books on every branch of sacred literature, which he had either bought at a price or received as presents from his friends.” On his return to England he bent his steps northward, being anxious to revisit his own people and the region in which he had been born: and so came to the kingdom of Northumbria. Here, he was well received by King Egfrith, to whom he gave a glowing account of the foreign monasteries and schools of learning and displayed the treasures that he had secured on his journey.
The King caught Benedict’s enthusiasm and, in AD 674, gave him a tract of land where he might found a monastery; and here, in a short time, rose the walls of the monastery of St. Peter at Wearmouth, on the left bank of the river from which the spot takes its name. Benedict must have been a good sailor, for he had to go far and cross the sea before he could find men capable of building a church of stone in the Romanesque style; but nothing daunted, he crossed over to France and brought back with him masons ready and able to do the work he wanted. If a stone church was a rarity in those days, glazed windows were positively unknown in this country; but Benedict was determined that nothing should be wanting to his new church, and so sent messengers again to France. Bede’s account of this is curious and interesting. “He sent messengers,” he tells us, “to bring over glass-makers (a kind of workman hitherto unknown in Britain) to glaze the windows of the church, and its aisles and chancels. And so it happened that when they came they not only accomplished that particular work which was required of them, but from this time they caused the English nation to understand and learn this kind of handicraft, which was of no inconsiderable utility for the enclosing of the lamps of the church, or for various uses to which vessels are put.” Great was the astonishment of the good folk of Northumbria at this innovation introduced first in the church of Monkwearmouth, and shortly afterwards, in Jarrow. So much so that a tradition sprang up, which was handed down for many generations, that, because of its glazed windows, it never was dark in old Jarrow church.
Once the building was finished and Benedict had ransacked the treasures of France to provide “whatever related to the ministry of the altar and the church and holy vessels and vestments.” But there were still some things that he wanted, which he could not discover even in France, and so, in AD 679, he set out for a fifth time for Rome. Here he obtained all that he could desire and returned literally laden with spoil. In the first place, says Bede, he imported a numberless collection of all kinds of books; secondly, he introduced some relics of the saints, which were highly esteemed in those days; thirdly, he brought in to his own monastery the order of chanting, singing and ministering in the church, according to the Roman manner – bringing back with him a precentor, John by name, who was to become the future master of his own monastery, and of the English nation; fourthly, he obtained, from the Pope, with the express permission of the King, a grant of certain privileges to his monastery; and lastly, he carried home with him paintings of holy subjects for the ornamentation of the church. There were paintings of the Blessed Virgin and of the Apostles at the east end; along the south side ran a series of figures of the Gospel history, while the north wall was filled with the sublime images of the Visions of St. John the Divine in the Revelation. We are told his reason for thus decorating his church was “to the intent that all who entered the church, even if ignorant of letters, might be able to contemplate, in what direction so ever they looked, the ever gracious countenance of Christ and his saints, even though it were in a representation; or, with a more wakeful mind, might be reminded of the grace of our Lord’s incarnation or, having as it were, the strictness of the last judgment before their eyes, should thereby be cautioned to examine themselves with more narrow scrutiny.”
And so his great work was finished, and the monastery which he founded rapidly grew and flourished, so that, in the short space of a year (AD 682), he sent out from it a colony of twenty-two monks, under St. Ceolfrith, and founded a sister monastery of St. Paul at Jarrow, with the hope “that mutual peace and concord, mutual and perpetual affection and kindness should be continued between the two places.” Scarcely ten miles apart, the two monasteries were to all intents and purposes but one.
Benedict was now growing old; but his new church at Jarrow was to be no less glorious than that at Wearmouth, and so, in spite of age and infirmities, in AD 685, he crossed the sea once more, and for the sixth and last time repaired to Rome; “returning, as was his custom, enriched with countless gifts for ecclesiastical purposes, with a large supply of sacred volumes and no less an abundance of paintings than on previous occasions. Some of these were scenes from the life of our Lord, which he placed in the old church; while, for the church of Jarrow, he brought back an excellent series of paintings showing the harmony between the Old and the New Testaments. For instance, side by side, the paintings represented such subjects as Isaac bearing the wood on which he was to be slain and our Lord carrying the cross on which he was to suffer; or the serpent raised up by Moses in the wilderness, and the Son of Man exalted upon the cross.”
Thus he lived long enough to see both monasteries fairly at work and their buildings completed, and then his work was over. Shortly after his return from Rome, he was seized with a creeping paralysis. For three years, the disease gradually gained upon him, yet he never lost his cheerfulness, nor ceased to praise God and exhort the brethren. He was often troubled by sleepless nights, when, to alleviate his weariness, he would call one of his monks and desire to have read to him the story of the patience of Job, or some other passage of scripture by which a sick man might be comforted, or one bent down by infirmities might be more spiritually raised to heavenly things. Nor did he neglect the regular hours of prayer, but as he was unable to rise from his bed to prayer and could scarcely raise his voice in praise, he would call some of the brethren to him that they might sing the psalms in two choirs, he himself joining with them to the best of his ability. Eventually, the end came. On 12th January AD 689, he died as he had lived, surrounded by the brethren of the monasteries of his own creation, and was buried in the stone church that he had reared at Wearmouth, in the midst of the treasures that he had collected.

Source

Followers as Mirrors

What is the best way to gauge the effectiveness of our leadership? I would say it is how the people you lead follow you. There is a quote I heard somewhere, and for the life of me I cannot remember where I heard it, “A leader without followers is just a guy out taking a walk.” This is very true.
The people that we lead are basically a mirror of our own leadership. What do I mean by this? The leader of any organization has to cast the vision. If there is no vision it is like setting out on a cross country trip without a map or a gps. Sure you will get there, eventually, but it will not be easy. The leader needs to cast, and then re-cast the vision. There should be no question where you are headed and how you are going to get there.
A leadership lesson that is always hard to learn is when it is time to modify your vision. In politics when someone changes their position they are called a flip flopper. I think this is an unfair characteristic. If someone changes their position because new information has come to light, I don’t call that flip flopping I call that leadership! The classic definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over but expecting a different outcome. A good leader knows how to listen and how to adjust their position. This is a skill I am constantly working on.
When taking the oath of enlistment in the military, you swear to obey the lawful orders of those appointed over you. You have to follow them or you will face the consequences. When I was in the US Army there were many people appointed over me as leaders. I always found it easier to follow those who would not do anything that they were not willing to do themselves. A good leader not only knows what those he leads do, they are willing to get in there and do it!
In the Army one never retreats one has a “tactical re deployment of assets.” Re deployment is not failure it is a recognition that the original plan is not working and we need to try something different. However, if this re deployment is going to work the entire team has to know what is going on.
One of the more famous quotes from Mahatma Gandhi “be the change you want to see in the world” still holds as true today as the day he spoke it. I don’t believe he was speaking specifically about leadership but it does come into play in this discussion.
Be the change we want to see. As a Church leader, if I want my parishioners to read more Scripture, I need to read more Scripture. If I want them to be more attentive at Liturgy, I need to be more attentive at Liturgy. If I want them to go to confession more, than I need to go to confession more. The people you lead are going to follow the tone that you set; you want to change their tone? Than change yours! It’s that simple.

Leaders Take Responsibility

Not everyone lives under the same rules. Sometimes we hold people to a higher standard than others in all that they do and leaders would be included in this group.
On November 2, 2011 Massachusetts Lt. Governor Timothy Murray was involved in a pretty horrific car crash on an empty road at 5:00 in the morning. The car he was driving was totaled and looking at the photos of the accident I am amazed he walked away without a scratch. Mr. Murray told police that he was not speeding and he was wearing his seatbelt. Just as a side not the car he was driving was his state issued car and it included a “black box” much like the ones that are in aircraft.
The State Police issued a report but not the data from the “black box’ and the local media wanted access to that information. Last week the data was released and it told a much different story than Mr. Murray told. According to the data, Mr. Murray was going 108 mph at the time of the crash and was not wearing a seatbelt. The State Police also mentioned he had fallen asleep, although I am not sure how they could tell that. So Mr. Murray lied!
Recently Dianne Williamson, an opinion columnist for the Worcester Telegram & Gazette, wrote a piece that basically absolved Mr. Murray of any liability for the lie because after all we all do it! Well Ms. Williamson we do not all do it and even if we did, we need to hold our leaders to a much higher standard. The State Police issued Mr. Murray a ticket for speeding, a marked lanes violation, and not wearing a seatbelt. The ticket was for $550 and recently it was announced that his campaign committee will reimburse the Commonwealth for the vehicle.
Yesterday there was another story in the T & G about a candidate for a police job in the Town of Southbridge, my home town. According to the report, this man had been offered a job but prior to being placed on the job some information came to light. It would seem the applicant made some videos that were on YouTube, a little not, what happens online does not stay online! These videos show the applicant holding a gun to the head of someone who came to his door dressed in drag and, according to the report, homophobic remarks were made. Not exactly what you want in a police officer. Last night I happened to read the comments on the article and once again people were making excuses for this guy saying things like his private life should not enter into this at all. I would agree to the point where you put it online now it is public. His application has been withdrawn.
Leadership is not easy at any level and unfortunately leaders are held, or should be held, to a higher standard. Leadership is all about integrity and once you lose your integrity it is very hard to get it back. This applies to the church as well. Leaders at all levels from lay leadership up to and including the bishops need to lead with integrity, it what Jesus did!
How do you lead with integrity? What examples do you follow?

7 January ~ St. Fursey, Abbot of Lagny, near Paris

He was the son of Fintan, son of Finloga, prince of South Muster, and Gelgesia, daughter of Aedhfinn, prince of Hy-Briuin in Connaught. He was born probably amongst the Hy-Bruin, and was baptized by St. Brendan the Traveller, his father’s uncle, who then ruled a monastery in the Island of Oirbsen, now called Inisquin in Lough Corrib.
He was educated by St. Brendan’s monks, and when of proper age he embraced the religious life in the same monastery under the Abbot St. Meldan, his “soul-friend” (anam-chura). His great sanctity was early discerned, and there is a legend that here, through his prayers, twin children of a chieftain related to King Brendinus were raised from the dead. After some years he founded a monastery at Rathmat on the shore of Lough Corrib which Colgan identifies as Killursa, in the deanery of Annadown. Aspirants came in numbers to place themselves under his rule, but he wished to secure also some of his relatives for the new monastery. For this purpose he set out with some monks for Munster, but on coming near his father’s home he was seized with an apparently mortal illness. He fell into a trance from the ninth hour of the day to cock-crow, and while in this state was favoured with the first of the ecstatic visions which have rendered him famous in medieval literature.
In this vision were revealed to him the state of man in sin, the beauty of virtue. He heard the angelic choirs singing “the saints shall go from virtue to virtue, the God of Gods will appear in Sion”. An injunction was laid on him by the two angels who restored him to the body to become a more zealous labour in the harvest of the Lord. Again on the third night following, the ecstasy was renewed. He was rapt aloft by three angels who contended six times with demons for his soul. He saw the fires of hell, the strife of demons, and then heard the angel hosts sing in four choirs “Holy, holy, holy Lord God of hosts”. Among the spirits of the just made perfect he recognized Sts. Meldan and Beoan. They entertained him with much spiritual instruction concerning the duties of ecclesiastics and monks, the dreadful effects of pride and disobedience, the heinousness of spiritual and internal sins. They also predicted famine and pestilence. As he returned through the fire the demon hurled a tortured sinner at him, burning him, and the angel of the Lord said to him: “because thou didst receive the mantle of this man when dying in his sin the fire consuming him hath scarred thy body also.” The body of Fursey bore the mark ever after. His brothers Foillan and Ultan then joined the community at Rathmat, but Fursey seems to have renounced the administration of that monastery and to have devoted himself to preaching throughout the land, frequetly exorcising evil spirits. Exactly twelve months afterwards he was favoured with a third vision. The angel remained with him a whole day, instructed him for his preaching, and prescribed for him twelve years of apostolic labour. This he faithfully fulfilled in Ireland, and then stripping himself of all earthly goods he retired for a time to a small island in the ocean. Then he went with his brothers and other monks, bringing with him the relics of Sts. Meldan and Beoan, through Britain ( Wales) to East Anglia where he was honourably received by King Sigebert in 633. The latter gave him a tract of land at Cnobheresburg on which he built a monastery within the enclosure of a Roman fort–Burghcastle in Suffolk–surrounded by woods and overlooking the sea. Here he laboured for some years converting the Picts and Saxons. He also received King Sigebert into the religious state. Three miracles are recorded of his life in this monastery. Again he retired for one year to live with Ultan the life of an anchorite.
When war threatened East Anglia, Fursey, disbanding his monks until quieter times should come, sailed with his brothers and six other monks to Gaul. He arrived in Normandy in 648. Passing through Ponthieu, in a village near Mézerolles he found grief and lamendation on all sides, for the only son of Duke Hayson, the Lord of that country, lay dead. At the prayer of Fursey the boy was restored. Pursuing his journey to Neustria he cured many infirmities on the way, by miracles he converted a robber and his family, who attacked the monks in the wood near Corbie, and also the inhospitable worldling Ermelinda, who had refused to harbour the weary travellers. His fame preceded him to Péronne, where he was joyfully received by Erkinoald, and through his prayers obtained the reprive of six criminals. He was offered any site in the king’s dominions for a monastery. He selected Latiniacum (Lagny), close to Chelles and about six miles from Paris, a spot beside the Marne, covered with shady woods and abounding in fruitful vineyards. Here he built his monastery and three chapels, one dedicated to the Saviour, one to St. Peter, and the third, an unpretending structure, afterwards dedicated to St. Fursey himself. Many of his countrymen were attracted to his rule at Lagny, among them Emilian, Eloquius, Mombulus, Adalgisius, Etto, Bertuin, Fredegand, Lactan, Malguil. Having certain premonitions of his end, he set out to visit his brothers Foillan and Ultan who had by this time recruited the scattered monks of Cnobheresburg and re-established that monastery but his last illness struck him down in the very village in which his prayer had restored Duke Haymon’s son to life. The village was thence-forward called Forsheim, that is, the house of Fursey. In accordance with his own wish his remains were brought to Péronne, many prodigies attending their transmission, and deposited in the portico of the church of St. Peter to which he had consigned the relics of Sts. Meldan and Beoan. His body lay unburied there for thirty days pending the dedication of the church, visited by pilgrims from all parts, incorrupt and exhaling a sweet odour. It was then deposited near the altar. Four years later, on 9 February, the remains were translated with great solemnity by St. Eligius, Bishop of Noyon, and Cuthbert, Bishop of Cambrai, to a chapel specially built for them to the east of the altar. In the “Annals of the Four Masters”, Péronne is called Cathair Fursa.
In art St. Fursey is represented with two oxen at his feet in commemoration of the prodigy by which, according to legend, Erkinoald’s claim to his body was made good; or he is represented striking water from the soil at Lagny with the point of his staff; or beholding a vision of angels, or gazing at the flames of purgatory and hell. It is disputed whether he was a bishop; he may have been a chorepiscopus. A litany attributed to him is among the manuscripts in Trinity College Dublin.

Source

7 January ~ Cedd of Lastingham, Bishop of the East Saxons

St. Cedd was the eldest of four holy brothers, born into a noble Northumbrian family at the beginning of the 7th century. With his siblings, Cynebil, Caelin & (St.) Chad, he entered the school at Lindisfarne Priory at an early age and learnt the ways of the Irish monks under Bishop Aidan. They were eventually sent to Ireland for further study and all four subsequently became priests…
In AD 653, the mighty armies of King Penda of Mercia expanded their monarch’s influence to the control of Middle Anglia (Leicestershire and parts of Lincoln and Derby), where his son Peada was appointed King. Soon afterward, the young king visited his neighbour, King Oswiu of Northumbria, at Walton (or Atwell or Wattbottle) and, as his new kingdom had already been considerably influenced by East Anglian Christianity, Peada agreed to be baptised in return for the hand of Oswiu’s daughter, Alchflaed. Bishop Finan of Lindisfarne therefore welcomed the King and a number of his nobles into the Christian faith and Oswiu provided him with four priests to instruct his people further. One of these was St. Cedd.
Within a year, Cedd returned home, having helped to convert much of Middle Anglia to Christianity. He travelled to Lindisfarne to confer with Bishop Finan, who promptly sent this impress young missionary out once more to evangelise the people of Essex, who were sorely in need of some spiritual guidance. King Oswiu, having imposed his overlordship there, had persuaded King Sigeberht Sanctus to adopt Christianity, in a general mobilization against Penda of Mercia. Cedd thus turned south again to spread the word of God amongst the East Saxons. He baptised many of the locals and built several churches – possibly Prittlewell and West Mersea amongst them – and is particularly noted for the foundation of monasteries at Ythanchester (Bradwell-on-Sea) and Tilaburg (East Tilbury).
The following year, Cedd made a brief visit to Northumbria once more, where Bishop Finan had no hesitation in ordaining him as Bishop of Essex. Back in his southern province, Cedd pursued the work he had previously begun with more ample authority. He re-instated St. Paul’s in London as the main seat of his diocese. He ordained priests and deacons to assist him in his work and gathered together a large flock of servants of Christ in his two monastic foundations.
Bishop Cedd always remained fond of his homeland, however, and was wont to make regular visits there. On one such occasion in AD 658, Cedd was approached by King Aethelwald of Deira who had been instructed in Christianity and administered the Sacraments by the Bishop’s brother, Caelin. Finding Cedd to be a good and wise man, he pressed upon him to accept a parcel of land at Laestingaeu (Lastingham in Yorkshire) on which to build a Royal monastery and prospective mausoleum. Cedd eventually agreed, but would not lay the foundation stones until the place had first been cleansed through prayer and fasting. This, he undertook himself throughout lent, until his brother, Cynebil, took over, when the Bishop was called to the Royal Court. Cedd was the first Abbot of Lastingham and remained so while still administering to his flock in Essex.
Christianity had not quite been universally accepted in Cedd’s southern province and, by AD 660, there was considerable discontent with the rule of King Sigeberht of Essex. He was murdered by his brothers, Swithelm and Swithfrith, and the former took the throne as a pagan King. St. Cedd was forced to flee north into East Anglia, where he settled at the Court of King Aethelwald at Rendlesham (Suffolk). The East Anglians appear to have held some sort of overlordship in Essex at this time and, within about two years, Aethelwald had persuaded Swithelm that it would be in his interest to become Christian. Cedd baptised him at Rendlesham, with Aethelwald as his godfather, and the two returned to Essex.
It was around this time that, owing to the influence of St. Wilfrid who had been established at Ripon by King Alchfrith of Deira, that a great divide was forming in the Northumbrian Church. All the missionaries of the north had been brought up in Iona or Lindisfarne, and followed the Celtic ritual. Wilfrid, ordained by a French bishop, introduced Roman ways. The split even extended to the Royal household where, each year, Oswiu celebrated the Celtic Easter feast and his Queen, the Roman. To settle this difference, and prevent a rupture, the King convened a religious synod at Whitby in AD 664. St. Cedd attended the synod – probably with his brother, Chad – to act as interpreter and to speak on behalf of his fellow Celtic ecclesiastics, Bishop Colman of Lindisfarne and Abbess Hilda of Whitby. On the opposing side were Abbot Wilfrid of Ripon, former Bishop Agilbert of Wessex, Romanus, the Queen’s chaplain, and James the Deacon who had remained in Swaledale after St. Paulinus had fled Yorkshire. After much debate, it was decided that the Roman usages should be adopted and Cedd, along with many others, reluctantly renounced the customs of Lindisfarne and returned to his diocese to spread the new Roman ways amongst the people of Essex.
The same year, Cedd visited his Abbey at Lastingham while a great plague was, unfortunately, raging through the area. Both he and his brother, Cynebil, fell sick and, after placing Lastingham in the charge of their youngest brother, Chad, they died. Cedd was first buried in the open air and his funeral was attended by some thirty monks from Bradwell who, sadly, also contracted the plague and died. Eventually, a little stone church was built at the Lastingham, in honour the Virgin Mary, and Cedd’s body was interred there, to the right of the altar. The latter remains intact in the Norman crypt that was later built on the site, though St. Cedd’s bones were removed around the same time to the cathedral founded by his brother, Chad, at Lichfield.

Source

Church Leadership

When one thinks of the Orthodox Church one thinks of many things, worship, theology, etc. the term leadership is not one that springs to mind right away. Oh sure we have our share and have had our share of leaders but what I am speaking of is leadership of the Church in the 21st century. Yesterday I wrote about Engaged Monasticism and how we need a different model of monasticism in 21st America, well we also need leaders of for the 21st Century.
During my seminary preparation there were no courses designed to teach leadership skills. I do not always buy into the saying that “leaders are born” I think leaders can be created and taught and mentored by other leaders. Flipping through the seminary catalogue today reveals only one leadership course, it’s called Parish Administration and it is a survey course taught once a week.
How do we lead churches with a diverse population? I have parishioners that span 4 generations from depression era, boomers, X, Y, millennials etc. they are all present in my parish. You do not lead all of those groups the same way. Good leaders inspire those they lead to do what needs to be done. Good leaders inspire those they lead to think outside the box. I have not always done this and it is something I hope to work on this year.
Good leaders are good readers and a good leader is also someone who is not afraid to change tact when needed. I grew up learning how to sail. When you sail you need to be conscious of the wind and change directions as the wind blows. Now I am not saying the church needs to change her theology or practice, no I am suggesting we need to change the way we present it.
Good leaders are good readers. I read a lot. I read a variety of things, some are from books and others are from blogs I have found useful on the web. There is a tremendous amount of information out there if you know where to look. Today I came across a list of “20 Blogs Every Church Leader Should be Reading” on the website Church Leaders. I was not surprised that on that list no Orthodox Leaders were present. I was surprised not to see the blog of Deacon Michael Hyatt but alas it was not there.
They are all Evangelical blogs written by pastors or other church leaders. No I know what you die hard Orthodox will say? What can we learn from them? I say to you get over yourself! If we were doing all we can do to lead our congregations we would be a force to be reckoned with. We “have found the true faith” we just don’t know how to tell people about it.
So what am I going to do? I have selected a few blogs from the list I quoted above and over the next year I will be posting links and excerpts from those blogs and putting into practice the lessons and letting you know how it has worked. I am not afraid to change what I am doing and I hope you are not as well. Let’s see if we can get an Orthodox Leadership Blog on that list next year.

Engaged Monasticism

I have been writing about monastic topics for the last few years. I have been trying to develop a sense of what I have called the “new monasticism” although it is not really all that new. I say it is not all that new but in the modern Orthodox Church, especially the Orthodox Church in North America this is a new concept.
In 369 AD St. Basil the great was a newly ordained priest ministering in and around the area of Constantinople. That year a drought hit followed by famine as the crops had all dried up. He delivered four homilies that have been complied in the book “On Social Justice” that spoke to the heart of how people act in these times of dire physical suffering. Many of the themes from these homilies are repeating themselves today as they have throughout history.
St. Basil had a vision of a new social order based upon simplicity of life and sharing rather than competition and private ownership. He had a vision for what would be called “the new city.”
Part of this new city would be an engaged monasticism, a monastic vision that was more urban than rural, a monasticism, which has at its very heart, service to the poor. He had a vision for what would be called the Basiliad, a complex of buildings where the poor and needy would come and find support and rest. Medical care would be provided by skilled physicians and food and clothing would be provided. But it was also to be a worship center with church services and a chapel. A place to truly live out the gospel message of “love of neighbor.”
The monks would practice the practical trades like carpentry and blacksmithing and the money generated from those trades would be used to support the work of the Basiliad. In his sermon, In Time of Famine and Drought” he speaks of this new community not as a new kind of charitable institution but a place where a new set of relationships would be formed. A new social order that would both anticipate and participate in the creation of “a new heaven and a new earth where justice dwells.” St. Basil used his vision of the first church at Jerusalem as an example, “Let us zealously imitate the early Christian community, where everything was held in common – life, soul, concord, a common table, individual kinship – while unfeigned love constituted many bodies as one and joined by many souls into a single harmonious whole.”
Fast forward to the 20th century and we find the writings of St. Mother Maria of Paris. I don’t think there is a saint that has influenced my thoughts on monasticism more than she has. Mother Maria saw the need for monasticism in the Orthodox Church, and as I have often said the church is at her best when monasticism is present in the Church, but as we have had to adapt the church to the new world monasticism needs to be adapted to the new world. Mother Maria, and I for that matter, does not believe that traditional monasticism can work in America, well not all aspects of it anyway.
Mother Maria wrote an essay that she called “Toward a New Monasticism” it was written at a time where refugees had swarmed into Paris during the Second World War. She had a house that she called the “Open Door” where she ministered to the refugees mostly on her own. In this essay she has this to say about monasticism and her view of a new monasticism:
“…monasticism in general is needed, but it is needed mainly on the roads of life, in the very thick of it. Today there is only one monastery for a monk – the whole world. This he must inevitably understand very soon, and in this lies the force of his innovation. Here many must become innovators against their will. This is the meaning, the cause, and the justification of the new monasticism. The new here is not characterized mainly by its newness, but by its being inevitable. There is no need to seek in these statements for any non-recognition of the old form of monasticism on principle. But, needed as it is, it does not exhaust what the churchly word now has the right to expect from monasticism. It may be only a part… of contemporary monasticism.”
We have other examples of the “New Monasticism” the most notable is St. Herman of Alaska. St. Herman came to the new world to minister not only to the Russians in Alaska but also to the native population. He was a monastic and came with other monastics, but did not live what one thinks of as a traditional monastic life.
We also have examples of engaged monasticism in the Church in North American now. St. Tikhon in South Canaan, Pennsylvania runs a seminary and prepares men for service in the church, they are engaged in the process and what is needed is more of this type of work.
What I am suggesting is not radical but a return to a vision of monasticism put forth in the 4th century by St. Basil. My belief is this is the style of monasticism that is needed in North America, we need balance in monasticism and this is an area that is lacking.

2011 ~ A Blog Year in Review

So I thought I would take a little look to see how the blog did this past year.  I guess its vanity but I do like to see where you are coming from and what you are interested in so I know what to write about.  It has been a pleasure to bring you thoughts and reflections this past year and I look forward to 2012.  Thanks for visiting in 2011.  These numbers come from Google Analytics.

13,567 People visited this blog in 2011
26, 476 Pages were viewed in 2011

4,355 were directed to this site from http://www.reddit.com/

64.88% were new visitors
35.11% were returning (I need to do a better job getting you to come back!)

91.26% of you speak English

Where are you from?
United States  81.07%
Canada  3.97%
UK 3.17%
Australia  1.23%

Top Posts for 2011

The top 2 were the main page and the About Me Page so I will not list those

Roman Catholic Orthodox Differences on Original Sin
Parastas (Paos) Service
Restless Night
Soup
Mystery Solved
Southbridge Tornado Update
How to Destroy a Culture in 5 Easy Steps
Orthodox Prayer Against Bad Weather
Easter Eggs not Spring Spheres
Tornado on the Ground

error: Content is protected !!