A Prayer for Our Country on Election Day

 

ivoted

Almighty God, who hast given us this good land for our heritage; We humbly beseech thee that we may always prove ourselves a people mindful of thy favor and glad to do thy will. Bless our land with honorable industry, sound learning, and pure manners. Save us from violence, discord, and confusion; from pride and arrogancy, and from every evil way. Defend our liberties, and fashion into one united people the multitudes brought hither out of many kindreds and tongues. Endue with the spirit of wisdom those to whom in thy Name we entrust the authority of government, that there may be justice and peace at home, and that, through obedience to thy law, we may show forth thy praise among the nations on earth. In the time of prosperity, fill our hearts with thankfulness, and in the day of trouble, suffer not our trust in thee to fail; all which we ask through Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen.

The Book of Common Prayer, 1945

Spiritual Revival has Nothing to do with Politics

Joanthan Edwards“Two things urgently needed in ministers, if they would attempt great advances for the kingdom of Christ, are zeal and resolve.  Their influence and power for impact are greater than we think.  A man of ordinary abilities will accomplish more with zeal and resolve than a man ten times more gifted without zeal and resolve. . . .  Men who are possessed by these qualities commonly carry the day in almost all affairs.  Most of the great things that have been done in the world, the great revolutions that have been accomplished in the kingdoms and empires of the earth, have been primarily owing to zeal and resolve.   The very appearance of an intensely engaged spirit, together with a fearless courage and unyielding resolve, in any person that has undertaken leadership in any human affair goes a long way toward accomplishing the intended outcome. . . .  When people see a high degree of zeal and resolve in a person, it awes them and has a commanding influence upon them. . . .  But while we are cold and heartless and only go on in a dull manner, in an old formal round, we will never accomplish anything great.  Our efforts, when they display such coldness and irresolution, will not even make people think of yielding. . . .  The appearance of such indifference and cowardice does, as it were, provoke opposition.”

Jonathan Edwards, “What must be done more directly to advance this work [of revival],” in Works(Edinburgh, 1979), I:424.  Wording updated.

H/T The Gospel Coalition

Is the Church Dying?

Church Dying

“The church is not dying, it is merely relocating to the streets” – Rev. Traci Blackmon

The question of whether or not the church is dying is an interesting one, and I would answer yes and no.  I attended a meeting of clergy and laity where the question of the death of the church was posed to a student preparing for ordained ministry.  The question was something like how are you going to prevent the church from dying.  I reject the premise of the and would say that perhaps the church as we know it today is dying but the Church of Jesus Christ will survive long after we are dust.

The church, like any social organization, needs to remake itself with each generation.  The church of today looks very different from the church that existed in my parent’s day.  I was raised in the Roman Catholic Church and a generation ago the Sunday Mass was in Latin.  There was a societal shift, and the Mass was allowed to be said in the language of the people.  Some hold this was a bad change while it opened up the mystery of the church to untold thousands of people.

I know we do not like to think of it in these terms, but the church is losing her relevance in today’s world only because she refuses to move with the times.  I am not saying, or perhaps in one way I am, that the church needs to change theology.  With that said I would say that the essential truths of the Christian faith should never change, but theology is evolving as we learn more about the language and the culture of the times that these things were written in.  I refuse to believe that God stopped talking after the canon of Scripture was written, and we have been left on our own all of these years.

Cultural shifts require a change.  The generation that is coming of age today has been brought up to question everything.  They are not satisfied with answers such as “we have always done it that way” or “it is faith you just have to believe it.”  These are educated young men and women in search of an authentic faith with genuine people and if the church is not going to be that for them they will look elsewhere.

Communication has also changed.  Yes, there was a time when the church believed that radio and TV are works of the Devil.  I will admit seeing how some so-called “Christian” preachers use this media has me wondering the same thing.  People today use social media and text as a way of communication.  It is here to stay, and we have to learn how to use it to spread the Gospel.

I know the argument; the internet is full of crap.  Sure that might be true but consider this.  There is a story in the one of the Gospels about being the salt, and if the salt loses its saltiness, we will perish.  In the ancient world, the fuel most commonly used for cooking was manure, that’s tight animal waste.  Manure was a cheap source of fuel for cooking as well as heat, but it did not burn very efficiently.  Somehow it was discovered that if salt were rubbed on the dry fuel, it would burn not only longer but hotter; salt made the crap better and more useful.

We are called to get our hands dirty and to work to make the world a better place.  We are the salt, and we need to mix with the crap so that we burn brighter, and our light will shine.

So, is the church dying?  No, the church is not dying it is transforming.  We have to discover new ways to reach people, we have to take Jesus out of the building and into the streets, as the quote above suggests, to meet people where they are.  There will always be a place for brick a mortar Christianity but the way we practice our ministry will have to change.

The Battle with Temptation

jesus_praying_temptation

In the previous chapters Luke gave us a glimpse of some of the greatest milestones in the life of Jesus and today’s story is one of the greatest. When Jesus was twelve, and in the Temple, he came to the realization that God was his father in a unique way. When John baptized Jesus in the Jordan River, God had given his approval, and now Jesus is about to begin his campaign to save humanity from itself.  Before embarking on this great work, he must decide the methods he will use to accomplish his mission. The temptation story shows Jesus choosing the method that he will use.  This is the story of rejecting power and glory and accepting the way of suffering and the cross.

However, before we start to look deeper at this story there are two points;

  1. This is the most sacred of stories because no one else was there to witness the events so Jesus must have shared this story with his followers at some point during his time with them.
  2. Even at this time in his ministry, Jesus must be aware of the tremendous powers he has. The whole point of temptation is that they could only come to someone who could do astonishing things. It is no temptation to us, for example, to turn stones into bread or leap from a Temple pinnacle, for the simple reason that it is impossible for us to this. These temptations could only come to someone whose powers were unique and who had to decide how to use them.

Let us first set the stage for what is about to happen.  The story takes place in the wilderness of Judea.  The inhabited part of Judea stood on the central plateau which stood on the central plateau which was the backbone of Southern Palestine. Between here and the Dead Sea stretched a terrible wilderness, thirty-five by fifteen miles. It was called “the Devastation.” The hills were like dust heaps; the limestone looked blistered and peeling; the rocks were bare and jagged; the ground sounded hollow to horses’ hooves; it glowed with heat like a vast furnace and ran out to the precipices 1,200 feet high, which swooped down to the Dead Sea. It was in this awesome devastation that Jesus was tempted.

These temptations did not come to Jesus as scenes in a play, but rather Jesus deliberately retired to his lonely place for forty days and wrestled with the problem of how he was going to win humanity.  For him, this was a long battle that did not end until the Cross and this story conclude by saying that the tempter left Jesus for a season.

The first temptation was to turn stones into bread. This wilderness was not a wilderness of sand; it was covered with little bits of limestone exactly like loaves of bread. The tempter said to Jesus, “If you want people to follow you, use your wonderful powers to give them material things.” He was suggesting that Jesus bribe people into following him.  Not unlike what we heard from some preachers today who say that if we follow Jesus, we will have riches beyond measure, well they are the only ones getting rich on that deal.  Jesus answered his tempter by quoting Deuteronomy 8:3, “A man will never find life in material things.”

The task of Christianity is not to produce new conditions, however; the voice of the Church must be behind all efforts to make life better.  Christianity’s real job is to create new people and to give these new people a new direction to follow.

In the second temptation, Jesus was on the top of a mountain from where he could see everything in the world.  The tempter said to him, “Worship me, and all will be yours.” This is the temptation to compromise. The devil said, “I have people in my grip. Don’t make your standards so high. Strike a bargain with me. Just compromise a little with evil and people will follow you.”  Jesus answered back, “God is God, right is right, wrong is wrong. There can be no compromise in the spiritual life.”

There is a constant temptation to seek to win people to Christ by compromising with the standards of the world. Recent studies have shown that people want a genuine and authentic spirituality, not a false one that bends and sways with the wind.  They want something concrete and understand it is a struggle and are willing to struggle with others as long as this struggle is authentic.  There are enough hypocrites in the world, and in the church, we need people ready to struggle with their spiritual lives authentically.

The third temptation the tempter asked Jesus to imagine himself on the pinnacle of the Temple where Solomon’s Porch and the Royal Porch met. There was a sheer drop of 450 feet down from this point.  Just as a comparison, out Tower in about 125 feet high so this would be almost four times a high as our tower. This was the temptation to give people sensations. “No,” said Jesus, “you must not make senseless experiments with the power of God.” Jesus saw quite clearly that if he produced sensations, he would be a nine days wonder, and he would not last.

The Church does not need flashing lights and smoke to win people.  Sure we can fill the seats with entertainment style worship, but it will not last.  There is no depth to a faith that requires smoke and mirrors to entertain people; this is not a rock concert.  The work of being a follower of Christ is not easy it requires love of those we do not want to love, it requires forgiveness when we do not wish to forgive, and it requires following Jesus Christ in a genuine and authentic way that will not only change our lives but the lives of others by our example. Sensationalism might fill the pews with people, but we have to be concerned with not only filling the church but filling people with the love of Christ and on this there can be no compromise.

If we truly wish to follow Jesus, and I hope we do, then that way will be filled with suffering but also with Joy.  The way of Jesus is a long road that ends with the Cross, but we know that the story did not end there.  The story concludes with the resurrection and his ascension to glory.  If we wish to get the crown we have to be willing to suffer.

The Anointed President?

Screen-Shot-2016-02-08-at-1.54.23-PM

There is an inherent danger to the political system and religion when the two start to get mixed.  Now I know that religion and politics have gone hand in hand for a long time, but the language being used by some Evangelical Christians is not only dangerous but frightening.

Just before the New Hampshire presidential primary, Mega Church Pastor Kenneth Copland was joined at his church by the father of Republican candidate Ted Cruz.  During the service, Copland announced that Cruz is anointed by God.  Speaking to Cruz’ dad Raphael, Copland said, “I believe, with all my heart, that his son is called and anointed to be the next president of the United States.”

As a Christian, I believe that God calls people to various occupations and vocations, and I have no doubt that Mr. Cruz has felt the nudge of God in his life to follow the path that he is on, however, God calls and the Church confirms.  I might feel called to be the Pope of Rome but unless I become that it was not God’s calling in my life.  How is Mr. Cruz going to explain to his followers if he is not elected?  God does not make mistakes; he leaves that up to humans.  Oh, I am sure there will be some excuse of the demonic media and secular lefties in America, but without a confirmation there simply is no call.  What is being advocated here is just bad theology.  Let us not forget Jim Jones said he was anointed, David Koresh said he was anointed.

But the truly dangerous part comes in the mixing of this anointed leader theology with the American political system.  We can argue whether or not the United States was founded as a Christian nation.  I would say that it was not.  It was based on Judeo/Christian ideals and morals but if the country was to be founded as a Christian nation that would have been clearly spelled out in the founding documents.  Yes, there are references to God in the Declaration of Independence but only as the giver of rights.  The Constitution makes no reference to God and makes it clear, in the Bill of Rights, that there is to be no state sponsored religion.  What the radical right is proposing is a theocracy and not a democracy.  By the way, Iran is a theocracy, and we don’t like that a whole lot.

To speak of America as a Christian nation denies the fundamental right of all of its citizens to practice their faith as they see fit.  If we believe that this is a Christian nation, then how do we deal with other religions?  I was involved in a recent discussion about prayer in school.  The person was advocating the return of this practice, and I asked how he would feel when the Muslim child stood up to pray.  His response was that he would not allow it since America was founded as a Christian nation.  Well, that is simply not religious freedom.  If we advocated such a stand, then we would be setting up a state-sponsored religion.  I asked a similar question about a Jewish child and still have not received a response.

Without getting overly religious, I will also say that many of the policies that Mr. Cruz is advocating are not exactly in line with the teachings of Jesus Christ.  Taking care of the poor and less fortunate, caring for the stranger among us, seeking out peace these are all ideals of the Christian faith, and I do not hear Mr. Cruz speaking in such terms.  I have no doubt that he sincerely believes what he is preaching but to call it Christian is a leap.

I have no issue with someone’s faith being part of their political ideology and I have no problem with someone’s faith not being part of the political ideology that is what makes America great.  Yes Mr. Trump, America already is great!  My issue lies with this notion that God has anointed someone to be President of the United States.  Sure God wants us to live a life worthy of Him and yes God calls people to all sorts of things, but we do not anoint Presidents in the United States, we fought off a government that believed in the Divine Right of Kings.  The entire argument about the separation of Church and state was directly related to the state-sponsored religious idea in Europe and many parts of Colonial America.

So let us move away from this notion of Mr. Cruz or any candidate being anointed and let’s just focus on choosing the candidate that best fits the vision of the America we want.  Being the best at what we were doing is to bring glory to God, and we do not have to be anointed to do that.

Mercy Street: A Review

Mercy Street

On January 17, 2016, PBS premiered their new Civil War Drama Mercy Street.  This program, Set in Richmond Virginia, tells the tales of medical professionals during the time of the American Civil War.  The setting of the hospital is a commandeered hotel that is being used by the Union Army to treat both Union, and Confederate wounded.

I liked the first episode and looked forward to the forthcoming episodes as the drama unfolds.  I say drama because that is exactly what it is, it is a drama, not a documentary, and there is a difference between the two that should be obvious.  As a drama, there is some artistic license that should be expected to make an interesting story so people will tune in each week. The initial response seems to be mixed with outrage to genuine pleasure; I think I fall somewhere in-between.

I am a living historian and as such I appreciate anything that gets people talking about history.  I have seen posts on the various Social Media outlets from fellow living historians complaining about the costumes and one “thread counter”* posted 10 minutes into the program that he could no longer watch because of the costumes.  Well, history has to be about more than just the costumes and if it is not then we have a very shallow and superficial view of history and that does a disservice to the actual people of history.  The people in the story, whether real of fictionalized, deserve far more than complaints about whether or not the uniform is correct or a lady would have worn this or that hat.

What this program is attempting to do is tell part of the Civil War story that is not usually discussed, and that is the story about the unsung heroes, many of them civilians, who at great risk to their lives, tended to the needs of those wounded on both sides of the conflict.  Viewers are given the opportunity to see firsthand, the thoughts of those involved and the internal struggles of Unionists treating the Confederate Soldiers and the constant reminders that as medical professionals they are to treat all patients regardless of the uniform they wear.

To those who dismiss programs such as these, for the reasons I mention above, I ask you to remember that what we do, present living history, is an attempt to start a conversation about the time frame that we portray, and I also remind you that any discussion about history is important so get down of your high horse and participate in the conversation.

I can appreciate any attempt to bring history into the lives of modern people who might otherwise not be interested, even if one person becomes interested because of programs such as this we should be grateful. In this day of revisionist history, we need to remind people that these events involved real people with real families and real struggles and they were not just people who dressed up for the weekend and camped out.

With all of that said I also can appreciate the need for historical accuracy and authenticity.  As a living historian, I strive to present myself as a person would have lived during the time frame that I portray but the “thread counters” almost kept me out of the hobby altogether.  Sure we strive to be as authentic as we can be, but the story should not be lost just because someone is not wearing the correct belt or they have on 21st-century glasses.  The story is the important part here.

So I recommend that you tune in on Sunday nights and watch Mercy Street and make up your mind about the program.

*A thread counter is exactly that someone who counts the number of threads in your “costume” to make sure it is authentic.  This will vary from people who give you the stink eye at an event to people who are outright rude to new and old people in the living history community.

 

The Gifts We Bring

three-kings

The Christmas Season has come to a close and today we remember two events in the life of Jesus, the visit of the Three Wise Men and his Baptism in the River Jordan by John the Baptist.  We will leave the Baptism for another day and turn our attention to the Wise Men.

What do we make of the visit of these three men?  The first thing that we have to understand is that we do not know how soon after the birth of Jesus the visit took place.  For artistic reasons we often see them, along with the shepherds, standing outside of the stable where Jesus was born.  The account from Scripture that we heard read this morning mentions a house, not a stable, and only mentions Mary as being there.  Not that it matters much to the story, but a little context is always a good thing.  You see we do not get an exact time line from Scripture, it is not a history book, but what we get should change our lives.

So we have these three men, some call them kings and some call them astrologers.  They come from the east, or literally from the rising of the sun.  Tradition and Tradition is not a bad thing, by the way; tradition tells us that they have come from Persia, Babylonia, and India.  Tradition also tells us their names, Melchior, the Persian; Caspar, or Gaspar the Indian; and Balthazar the Babylonian. Three men, from three different places, all meeting on a journey.

They come because they were in search of something and noticed a star, or as the Scripture has it, his star.  They first come to see King Herod; this is where the tradition comes from that they were kings as the first thing a king would do when entering another king’s territory is to pay him a visit.  They come to Herod and ask if he knows where this new baby might be. Herod calls the chief priests together and asks them where the Messiah will come from, and they tell him Bethlehem.  So he sends the men there and asks them to come back and tell him is this is so.

The three men set out on their journey, but why did they come what drew them?  They were seekers in search of something that they did not understand.  They saw a sign and were interested to find out what it all meant, and so they set off on a pilgrimage to find the answer.  Not unlike what we are doing in our spiritual life, we are searching for meaning and for clarity and so we set off on a pilgrimage to find the answers.

So they follow the star and when it stops they find Jesus.  They enter the house and find Jesus with his mother.  Tradition tells us that two years has passed since his birth.  They enter the house and kneel before him to pay him homage.  For a king to kneel before anyone is an extraordinary thing, and the writer of the Gospel points this out, so we understand the gravity of the situation.  This is not just another baby; even pagans recognize him as the Messiah.

They present the child with gifts, gold frankincense and myrrh. These gifts have a practical meaning, but they also have a spiritual meaning to them.  Gold is obvious it is valuable and, once again, tradition tells us that Mary and Joseph used this to finance their time spent in Egypt.  Frankincense is a perfume and would be used, well as a perfume, and myrrh was used in the burial ritual.

But they also have a spiritual meaning for us; gold is the symbol of kingship.  Again we see these visitors recognizing Jesus as a king. Frankincense was the symbol of a deity or a god, and the myrrh was a symbol of death.  So in these gifts, we see the Gospel story being told.  Jesus is the Messiah or a king, but he is also God, and he will be crucified and die.

Another interesting fact is that these men represented all ages and races.  We turn again to tradition. Caspar was the oldest and hailed from Tarsus the “Land of Merchants” located in present day Turkey.  He is depicted in art as an old man with a white beard and convention tells us that he would be about 60.  Next in line Melchior, who came from Arabia and was considered middle aged and would be about 40.  The youngest was Balthazar and is origins are a cause for disagreement.  He is usually depicted as black and, therefore, would have come from Africa perhaps Ethiopia, and he was thought to be about 20 and is therefore not depicted with a beard.

Why does this matter?  Because they came from the ends of the earth, old and young, shepherds and kings, to worship the Messiah.  What they all came is a search of something, and they all brought gifts to honor him, and so the question we have to ask ourselves today is what gifts do we bring?

All of us have various gifts that have been given to us from God for our use but also for the use in the Kingdom of God.  Do we thank God for the gifts that we have?  Are we using those gifts for the furtherance of the Kingdom here on earth?  What are we using them for?  Are we giving all we have to the king or are we holding back a little just in case?  Do we trust him, and by that I mean do we trust him, to know us better than we know ourselves?  These are all questions we need to be asking ourselves not just today but every day.

I recently saw a picture; it was a stick figure drawing, of a person standing before Jesus, you could tell it was Jesus because he has long hair.  The person was holding a heart in his hand, and the caption read this is all I have, and the response from Jesus was it is all I need.  In the end, that is all he needs your willing heart.

We have to be ready, like the Wise Men, to set off on a journey and follow the star wherever it leads us.  It may lead us outside of our comfort zone, and it may lead us to think about things in a new way, but we have to be willing to take that first step.  The Wise Men had an idea; they had an inkling inside them that there was something special at the end of their journey, and they were not let down.  Tradition tells us that they were pagans, but tradition also tells us that they left changed in some way and that they eventually converted, and that is what we have to do.  We need to leave here changed in some way, even if it is just a little.

Let’s Pray:

By your Spirit, Almighty God, Grant us Love for others, Joy in serving you, Peace in disagreement, Patience in suffering, Kindness toward all people, Goodness in evil times, Faithfulness in temptation, Gentleness in the face of opposition, Self-control in all things. Then strengthen us for ministry in your name.  Amen.

Church Trends in 2016

Church Trends

Church leaders need to be in tune to trends that will shape the future of society and eventually shape the future of the church.  I know the argument that the church should be influencing society, and that is great, but if no one is coming to church or listening to your message you will not be an influencer.

Pastor Carey Nieuwhof writes a blog with an emphasis on Church Leadership, and in his most recent entry he tackles the 5 Disruptive Church Trends that will Influence 2016. The first trend he tackles is the issue of social media and the church.  In the article Pastor Carey notes that the online presence of the church will be an advance and not just a supplement or a replacement to the church.  I have to agree and pastors need to learn to use social media much better than we currently do.  If you are not using social media for outreach and evangelism you are missing a great opportunity.

Here is a little bit of the rest of this wonderful essay:

There’s little doubt culture is changing rapidly.

The question is, are you ready as a church leader?

As I shared in my new book, Lasting Impact (you can download the first chapter for free here), if the change inside the church isn’t equal to or greater than the change outside our walls, irrelevance is inevitable.

While that thought can be somewhat depressing, think of the flip side.

History belongs to the innovators. It belongs to the leaders who dared to dream, to try things no one else was trying, to experiment, to push the boundaries of what everyone else believed was possible.

Read the Rest Here

Pastors and Historical Research

fact check

I will admit it; I love social media, and I think it is an excellent tool for evangelism and understanding.  However, one of the biggest problems with social media is the ability to post whatever we want and then, just because we know the person who posted it, believes it and then shares it.  I have fallen victim to this myself and have shared items without checking them only to have to take them down after the fact.

As we move along in the political season, and more and more information will be posted online, it is important for everyone, but especially pastors, to verify the information that they are posting. Pastors are community leaders and as such we have a tremendous responsibility to provide factual information.  My new rule of thumb is if I do not have time to verify I should not post it.

With all of this in mind, historian John Fea pointed readers of his blog to a recent essay about the importance of reliable historical research and offered some tips.  Here is a little bit of the article:

A friend of mine was preparing his sermon. We happened to be at the same social function, and so he casually asked me what I knew about medieval illuminations (i.e. fireworks). To be honest, I didn’t know much. From my years of teaching world history I knew that gunpowder and fireworks had originated in Asia and spread rather slowly (along trade routes and through military ventures) to Europe. Hence European fireworks are really an early modern/modern phenomenon.

My friend’s question, however, was fairly specific: when was the earliest use of fireworks for a royal event in England? This was beyond my general knowledge.

I wasn’t worried. I knew I could quickly find the answer. So I did, and told my friend what he needed the next day (late fifteenth century, for those of you interested).

I am a professional historian. But the methods I employed to help my friend are not monopolized by my profession. Most of the tools pastors need for basic yet reliable historical research are readily available in our digital age. So, for those of you who like to “do-it-yourself”, here is a quick guide to becoming (at least for the basic stuff) your own personal historian.

Read the Rest Here

error: Content is protected !!