His Beatitude Daniel, Patriarch of Romania, Sends Greetings to Pope Francis

His Beatitude Patriarch Daniel
His Beatitude Patriarch Daniel

From the Romanian Patriarchate

His Holiness Pope FRANCIS
Vatican City

Your Holiness,

The Romanian Orthodox Church is sharing in these moments of joy of the Roman Catholic Church, following Your Holiness’ election as Bishop of Rome and Pope.

We are convinced that the genuine moral values, based on the bi-millenary Christian faith, will continue to be central in your activity as the Primate of the Roman Catholic Church, taking into account the work that Your Holiness has already undertaken during your pastoral activity in Argentina. This mission is also a priority in our Orthodox Church. Therefore, in this context, it is very necessary to cooperate in order to realise solidarity with those who suffer most from the economical and spiritual crisis of contemporary world, in order to give a common witness to the world, in the spirit of the merciful love of our Lord Jesus Christ.

We express also our hope that Your Holiness will continue to support our Romanian Orthodox faithful living in large number in various countries of Europe, particularly in Italy, as it was constantly promoted by your predecessors late Pope John Paul II and Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI.

With esteem and fraternal love in Christ

† DANIEL
Patriarch of the Romanian Orthodox Church

gizzmo

Sanctităţii Sale Papa FRANCISC
Cetatea Vaticanului

Sanctitatea Voastră,

Biserica Ortodoxă Română se alătură acestor momente de bucurie ale Bisericii Romano-Catolice, ca urmare a alegerii Sanctităţii Voastre ca Episcop al Romei și Papă.

Suntem convinși că valorile morale autentice, bazate pe credinţa bimilenară creștină, vor continua să aibă un loc central în activitatea Sanctităţii Voastre ca Primat al Bisericii Romano-Catolice, având în vedere lucrarea pastorală pe care Sanctitatea Voastră aţi întreprins-o deja în Argentina. Această misiune este o prioritate şi în Biserica noastră Ortodoxă. De aceea, în acest context, este foarte necesar să cooperăm, pentru a realiza solidaritate cu cei care suferă cel mai mult de pe urma crizei economice și spirituale a societăţii contemporane, pentru a da o mărturie creştină comună în lume, în spiritul iubirii milostive a Domnului nostru Iisus Hristos.

Ne exprimăm speranța că Sanctitatea Voastră Veţi continua să-i sprijiniţi pe credincioșii ortodocşi români care trăiesc în număr mare, în diferite ţări din Europa, în special în Italia, așa cum constant au făcut-o predecesorii Voştri, vrednicul de pomenire Papa Ioan Paul al II-lea și Papa Emerit Benedict al XVI-lea.

Cu stimă și dragoste frățească în Hristos,

† DANIEL
Patriarhul Bisericii Ortodoxe Române

His All-Holiness congratulates newly-elected Pope Francis

PB_012
His All Holiness Patriarch Bartholomew Ecumenical Patriarch

Source:Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople.

Immediately following the election of Pope Francis on the evening of March 13, His All-Holiness communicated the following congratulatory message to the Vatican:

In the joy and jubilation of Your election as the pastoral leader of Roman Catholic Christians throughout the world, we are communicating with Your Holiness in order to express to You and the devout faithful of Your blessed Church our wholehearted congratulations and sincerest salutations on this special day.

Permit us also, on this historic occasion, to convey our unfeigned wishes and fervent prayers that your papal tenure may prove to be a source of peace in our world of turmoil and division, a refuge and consolation for our Lord’s poor and suffering brothers and sisters, as well as a continuation of our journey toward reconciliation and consolidation of the dialogue toward unity as Sister Churches.

May God grant Your Holiness many years of healthy and fruitful ministry to serve His people with Your distinctive humility, simplicity, and charity.

At the Ecumenical Patriarchate, on March 13th, 2013

Your Holiness’ beloved brother in Christ

+ BARTHOLOMEW
Archbishop of Constantinople-New Rome
and Ecumenical Patriarch

Read the original letter (PDF)

h/t Koinonia

The Election of a Patriarch

Patriarch Daniel of Romania
Patriarch Daniel of Romania

With all of the news focused on Conclave in Rome, I have received many questions about how Patriarchs in the Orthodox Church are elected.  Like the rest of the world, I did not expect the Cardinals to work so quickly to elect a new Bishop of Rome, but I figured since the question had been asked why not try and answer it.

As I understand systems, each Patriarchate has a similar, yet different, process to elect the Patriarch.  Last year saw the election of the Pope of the Coptic faithful by a small boy wearing a blindfold and reaching into an urn to select a name.  I also read this week that the election of the Patriarch of Constantinople has changed over the years with influence of the Turkish Government.

I am a priest of the Romanian Orthodox Church and thus the Patriarch of Romania so I will attempt to describe the process for this particular Church.  The process for the Election of the Patriarch is included in the document, “The Statutes for the Organization and Functioning of the Romanian Orthodox Churches” most specifically Article 127 of that document.

First, who can be elected:

Article 127 Section 1 states the following:

Any Metropolitan, Archbishop or Eparchial bishop, Romanian Citizen, Doctor or Graduate of theology who imposed himself in the life of the Church and society through pure life, theological culture, ecclesiastic dignity, missionary zeal and household sense, can be elected Patriarch.

So basically any baptized male with a degree in theology.  Notice the candidate does not have to be priest or bishop prior to his election.

Now some definitions

The Holy Synod: The Highest Authority in the Romanian Orthodox Church.  Made up of the Patriarch, who chairs the Synod and all of the Bishops and Assistant Bishops of the Romanian Orthodox Church inside and outside of Romania.

The Standing Synod: The Central Deliberative body made up of the Patriarch, who is the chair, and all of the Metropolitan Bishops of the Romanian Orthodox Church again from inside and outside of Romania.  The Standing Synod also includes 1 Archbishop and 2 Bishops assigned each year by the Holy Synod.  As I understand the function of the Standing Synod, this is the group that meets between meetings of the Holy Synod to assist the Patriarch in the running of the Church.

Church National Assembly: The Central Deliberative Body of the Church for the administrative, social, cultural, economic, and patrimonial fields.  This assembly is made up of the Holy Synod, and 3 representatives from each Diocese of the church, 1 clergy and 2 lay people.  The Assembly meets once a year or as needed and is chaired by the Patriarch.  There is a list of items that this group has the responsibility for but think of this group as the Legislative arm of the Church.

Now to the actual election

When the Patriarchal Throne has been vacated either by death, resignation, removal, or retirement (yes Patriarchs do retire) the Metropolitan with the highest seniority becomes the Locum Tenes of the Patriarchal Throne.

The Holy Synod will consult with the National Assembly as well as the members of the Eparchial Assembly of the Archdiocese of Bucharest, the Patriarch is also the Archbishop of Bucharest and Metropolitan of Muntenia and Dobrudgea.  Also present at this meeting will be the deans of the theological faculties, and a director from all of the seminaries.

A list of possible candidates is drawn up and a vote, by secret ballot, is taken.  The two names that received the most votes will be submitted to the Standing Synod along with all of the bishops hat received votes.

The Holy Synod will meet, and voting by secret ballot, will create a list of three names to be elected Patriarch.

The Holy Synod then meets for the purpose of the election of the Patriarch.  The meeting of the Synod is chaired by the Locum Tenes with all of the other bishops participating and sitting according to rank and the date of their consecration.

The President is assisted by four bishops during the election.

Two urns are used for the purpose of placing the ballots. The names of the candidates received from the Church National Assembly and the Synod of bishops are used for the election.

Each bishop is given a ballot, he “kisses the Holy Gospel, and marks the ballot, with fear of God, the name of the one who he thinks worthy to be elected.” Article 128, section 4.

The President counts the votes, passing them from one Urn to the other.  The count must equal that of the ballots distributed.  Each vote is unfolded and shown to the two assistants and the name is read out loud for all to hear.  The secretary records each vote and then determines that the number equals the total votes cast.

The Patriarch of Romania is the candidate who receives two thirds of the votes cast, if no one is elected on the first ballot a second ballot is taken in the same manner this time with only the two candidates who received the most votes on the first ballot.

Although different from that of what we witnessed in Rome this week, parts of the process are similar.  One of the major differences is that the names of the candidates are known to the faithful prior to the election and, as demonstrated by the procedure, the lay people are consulted all along the process.  They do not do the actual voting, but they participate in the selection of the candidates.

It should be noted that lay people are also involved in the process of selecting bishops.  Ultimately the Holy Synod elects bishops, but each local Eparchial Assembly selects candidates for bishops from among the monastics in the Church.

I will write about that process in another essay.

Why Do I Care?

REUTERS pool photo
REUTERS pool photo

This question was put to me on Facebook yesterday as I was making comments about the Papal election presently underway in Rome.  Why do I, as an Orthodox Christian, care about who becomes the next Bishop of Rome.  Well, there are many reasons and these are in no particular order.

1.  The Bishop of Rome speaks for more than one billion people living in the world.  Now I don’t know exactly how many people live on this planet we call home but that seems like a pretty significant number.  Just for comparison sake, although Orthodoxy Christianity is the second largest group of Christians in there world there are only about 300 million of us and no one Patriarch speaks for all of us.

2.  From an historical perspective this is big news.  This is the first time in more than 600 years that a sitting Pope resigned his office.  This is also the first Conclave of the Social Media era so it is interesting to watch, and like I said yesterday, even with all of the technology and social media we all still watch a chimney to get the news, and wait for a person to walk out on a balcony and tell the world who the next bishop of Rome will be.  That’s what I like to call tradition and it reminds me that no matter how much or how fast the world is changing the Church remains constant, or should remain constant.

3.  Whether we Orthodox like to think of this or not, the Bishop of Rome is really the moral voice of the world’s Christians.  Yes we disagree on the interpretation of that morality, but for the most part we agree.  So when the Bishop of Rome speaks about Abortion, contraction, war, peace, immigration, etc. we Orthodox need to listen.  This is not a matter of theology but of morals and we share much in common.

4.  Who gets elected has a lot to do with any hopeful reunification of the Roman Catholic Church and the Orthodox Church.

5.  They have cool stuff they do and it is nice to watch!

6.  Most of my family is Roman Catholics and I care because they do!

7.  Cardinal Sean O’Malley of Boston might get elected and I have actually met him in person and I think it would be cool to say I met him once.

So those are my reasons.  But I think the most important one is that because the Roman Catholic Church has not changed the way they do things, and because much of this is shrouded in secrecy there is something rather comforting about it.  I mentioned it earlier in this essay, but it has to do with tradition.  What we Orthodox share in common with the Roman Catholic Church is our desire to remain faithful to the Apostolic tradition, before you start to hate I know the argument so just move on, and at the same time remain relevant in people’s lives in the 21st Century.

Both of our churches agree that we do not change our theological positions or our moral positions based on which way society is going.  We both agree that the Church informs society not the other way around.  It is a pipe dream to think that the next Bishop of Rome is going to allow married men to be ordained priests, or that women will suddenly be allowed to get ordained, or that abortion on contraception will be okay, there are plenty of churches that one can attend where all of those things are okay.  No need to show up early at them either there are plenty of open seats!

The Orthodox and Roman Catholics share a common faith and a common tradition.  We express that differently but we are joined by our common history.  That is why I care and that is why you should care.  What these 115 Cardinals do has some effect on the Orthodox as well.

Sermon ~ Sunday of the Last Judgment

lastjudgement1

The Gospel of Matthew 25:31-46

The Lord said, “When the Son of man comes in his glory and all the holy angels with him, then he will sit on his glorious throne. Before him will be gathered all the nations, and he will separate them one from another as a shepherd separates the sheep from the goats, and he will place the sheep at his right hand, but the goats at the left. Then the king will say to those at his right hand, ‘Come, O blessed of my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world; for I was hungry and you gave me food, I was thirsty and you gave me drink, I was a stranger and you welcomed me, I was naked and you clothed me, I was sick and you visited me, I was in prison and you came to me.’ Then the righteous will answer him, ‘Lord, when did we see you hungry and feed you, or thirsty and give you drink? And when did we see you a stranger and welcome you, or naked and clothe you? And when did we see you sick or in prison and visit you?’ And the King will answer them, ‘Truly, I say to you, as you did it to one of the least of these my brethren, you did it to me.’ Then he will say to those at his left hand, ‘Depart from me, you cursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels; for I was hungry and you gave me no food, I was thirsty and you gave me no drink, I was a stranger and you did not welcome me, naked and you did not clothe me, sick and in prison and you did not visit me.’ Then they also will answer, ‘Lord, when did we see you hungry or thirsty or a stranger or naked or sick or in prison, and did not minister to you?’ Then he will answer them, ‘Truly, I say to you, as you did it not to one of the least of these, you did it not to me.’ And they will go away into eternal punishment, but the righteous into eternal life.”

gizzmo

Today’s Gospel brings us face to face with reality, the reality that all of us will one day be judged for the things we have done and for the things we have not done.  This is a turning point in the ministry of Jesus.  The cross is before Him and he now begins to talk about the end of not only His ministry, but the end of all.

The standard by which all of us will be judged is that of uncalculated mercy towards all.

Mercy is a fascinating word.  It comes to us from Middle-English and French “Merci” “Thanks” and from the Latin “Merced” the price paid, or wages.  Mercy is what we do for others, and we do it because someone has already paid the price, with His very life.

We see in this Gospel and emphasis on the works of faith.  These are the exact works that the reformers said were not necessary for salvation, and although I would agree with them I would say that these works are the natural outgrowth of that saving faith.  A saving faith will always produce righteous works because a person of faith cannot just stand by and watch the suffering of others, they must get in there and get their hands dirty.  The actions that we take, the works of mercy that we perform are what reflect our inner state.  We do not do these things for our own glory, in fact, we should do them without any expectation of thanks, but we do them for the “least” among us.

Today we get a glimpse of what the final judgment will be like.  We see a separation of the sheep and goats.  On one hand are those who have done and on the other hand we have those who have done not.  We have people of action, and we have people of inaction.  It’s not so much about what we do it’s about not squandering the gifts that God has given us.  It’s about looking at another human being, as an Icon of Christ, and having compassion on them.  It’s about forgiveness and it is about doing something.

At first glance,  the Gospel is asking us what we have done for the physical needs of people, have we fed them, have we clothed them, did we visit them when they were sick or in prison.  But, it needs to go much deeper than that.  What are we doing for the spiritual needs of others?  This is not just aimed at us as individuals but as a community.

Are we truly feeding people with the word of God?  Do we live our lives in a way that will bring people to the faith, and that will bring glory to God?  Are we helping people to be clothed in righteousness and are we clothed in righteousness?  Are we doing all we can, or are we doing just enough to get by?

We are standing in the doorway of one of the most solemn times of the Church year.  We are getting ready to embark on a time of spiritual renewal, that is we take the time, truly take the time we will be changed forever.

When a person enlists in the military, the first phase of their training is basic training.  Depending on the branch of service one chooses the time of basic training can vary.  The entire philosophy of basic training is to break you down so that you can be built back up.  This happens not only physically, but it happens mentally.  The old person has to die so that the new and improved person can be born.

During the weeks of training,  the recruit is taxed physically with endless pushups and other physical exercises, but the rookie is also taxed mentally with constant exercises so that doing certain tasks just become natural.  Great Lent is the same way.

During the six weeks of “spiritual boot camp” we will be broken down physically, mentally, and spiritually that is if we try.

Last week I was interviewed by a reporter for the Worcester Telegram.  She was doing a story on people who give up Facebook and other forms of social media for Lent.  She asked me my thoughts on the whole thing and essentially I said giving up something is useless if we do not change along with it.  Far too many people pay Lent lip service by giving up soda or coffee, or perhaps chocolate only to return to that same behavior when Lent is over.  The whole reason we sacrifice something, and please if you are going to give something up make it a sacrifice, is to make a change in our lives.  I have said this to you before if you are the same person at the end of Lent as you were at the beginning it did not work!  We have to be different, we are called to be different during this time of the year, and it has to mean something otherwise we are just paying it lip service.

We talk a lot about abstinence this time of year.  As you are well aware, the Orthodox Church calls us to an extremely strict sense of abstinence during Great Lent.  For some of us it is easier than others, we are all in a different place on our journey, and we are all called to do the best we can.  However, we have to do something that is different regarding food.  We abstain from certain foods not as punishment but so we can make an internal change to our lives.  Real changes comes from inside, that is where the hard work is done.

These approaching six weeks are supposed to be difficult, they are supposed to be a struggle, and they are supposed to be different.  I am not going to tell you what to do, but if you want some suggestions just ask.

Whatsoever you do to the least of these, you do to me!  Whatever it is that we do, or that we do not do, to those who are spiritually hungry and thirsty, or those or are physically hungry or thirsty we do to Christ Himself.  This is not only others but ourselves.

We have an opportunity to make some real change in our lives and in the lives of others.  During Great Lent the whole feeling of the Church changes, these past weeks the Scripture readings have been calling us to a sense of watchfulness but also of repentance.  We have an opportunity over the next weeks to strengthen our faith life we just have to make the decision that these weeks are going to be different, and we have to make the decision that we are going to be different.

The end of today’s Gospel clearly points to what will happen at the Last Judgment.  Those who have not will go away into everlasting punishment and those who have to eternal life.  Where do you want to go?

11 March ~ St. Constantine of Scotland, King & Martyr

He died in 576. Constantine was a king of Cornwall, the son of Padeon, whose conversion probably dates from a confrontation with St. Petroc who was sheltering a stag which had taken refuge with him.

Constantine married a princess from Brittany who died shortly after the marriage and the King was so desolated that he left his kingdom and sought sanctuary, first at S. David’s monastery at Menevia and then in Ireland at Rathin, made famous by St. Carthage and Mochuda. He arrived at Rathin unannounced and was set to work in the granary, grinding corn in a stone quern. One day he was heard by one of the monks laughing and saying to himself, “Is this really Constantine, King of Cornwall, who wore a helmet and bore a shield, working this handmill? It is the same, and yet it is not”.
This conversation was reported to the abbot who took him into the community and after a while he was ordained priest. He had spent seven years at the abbey before he was recognised and by now he was quite an old man, but he desired to visit Iona and set off with the blessing of the abbot. St. Columba received him kindly and sent him on to Sr. Kentigern, whom he may have met when he was at Menevia. While visiting Glasgow he stayed for some time with St. Mirren at Paisley and the two became great friends so that Constantine decided to build himself a monastery nearby at Govan by the river. It is interesting that the ruined church of St. Constantine, on the shore of the Bay that bears his name, has the parish of St Merryn adjoining it and the font in St Merryn’s Church comes from St Constantine’s.
After St. Constantine had founded his monastery at Govan he still felt impelled to preach the Faith of Christ to the heathen and he went to Kintyre with a party of his monks. There, by Campbeltown Loch a party of robbers came upon him and hacked him and his one attendant to pieces. The ruins of a church at Kilchouslan are supposed to mark the spot where the first of the martyrs of Scotland was attacked and left to die, bleeding to death from a severed arm. His brethren found him and received his blessing before he died. They took his body back to Govan and buried him in the church that has his name. His sarcophagus was discovered in 1855 and has been restored to the church which keeps his festival on March 11th.
Troparion of St Constantine Tone 5
Grieving at the loss of thy young spouse,/ thou didst renounce the world, O Martyr Constantine,/ but seeing thy humility God called thee to leave thy solitude and serve Him as a priest./ Following thy example,/ we pray for grace to see that we must serve God as He wills/ and not as we desire,/ that we may be found worthy of His great mercy.
Kontakion of St Constantine Tone 4
Thou wast born to be King of Cornwall,/ O Martyr Constantine,/ and who could have foreseen that thou wouldst become the first hieromartyr of Scotland./ As we sing thy praises, O Saint,/ we acknowledge the folly of preferring human plans to the will of our God.

Watchfulness

The Gospel of Luke 21:8-9,25-27,33-36

The Lord said, “Take heed that you are not led astray; for many will come in my name, saying, ‘I am he!’ and, ‘The time is at hand!’ Do not go after them. And when you hear of wars and tumults, do not be terrified; for this must first take place, but the end will not be at once. And there will be signs in sun and moon and stars, and upon the earth distress of nations in perplexity at the roaring of the sea and the waves, men fainting with fear and with foreboding of what is coming on the world; for the powers of the heavens will be shaken. And then they will see the Son of man coming in a cloud with power and great glory. Heaven and earth will pass away, but my words will not pass away. But take heed to yourselves lest your hearts be weighed down with dissipation and drunkenness and cares of life, and that day come upon you suddenly like a snare; for it will come upon all who dwell upon the face of the whole earth. But watch at all times, praying that you may have strength to escape all these things that will take place, and to stand before the Son of man.”

gizzmo

The Gospel passage quoted above is that set aside for the Saturday of Souls in the Orthodox Church.  This passage speaks directly to, what some will call, the end of the world.  I am not a bog person on the end of the world.  Some people see the things happening today and say that the end is near, I like to keep in mind that these things have been going on for generations, but that does not mean we don’t need to be ready.

Jesus is telling us that we must be terrified when we hear of wars and tumults, concerned, yes, but terrified, no.  He also cautions us not to be led astray by those who are saying, “The time is at hand!”  I often wonder about the Harold Campings of the world or the others like him, if they have ever read this Gospel passage.

There is a television show called Doomsday Preppers.  I have only watch the program one time and then I did not completely watch the episode.  The show is about people who getting ready for the end of the world by building bunkers and bug out bags and all manner of things.  My question is what are they doing to prepare their soul?  What are we doing to prepare our souls?  Are we more concerned with our lives here on earth then we are about our lives when this world passes away?  The world might be a better place is we focused our attention on the spiritual rather than the material for a while.

Jesus gives us hope, hope is something the doom and gloom crowd will not give us, but Jesus gives us hope that all will pass away save His word.  He reminds us to be watchful at all times as that will give us strength to go on with our lives.  We should not be so concerned with the things going on around us and we must be prepared.

Making a Difference

I will admit it, I like movies.  However, I have never been one to watch a movie and then think seriously about it.  I can remember in my college days, we used to go to the movies about once a week and watch whatever was playing.  After we would go and grab coffee somewhere and the conversation normally would gravitate towards the movie we just saw.  There were all of these deep thoughts about it, and I was like, “ya, it was a good story.”  Maybe I am not a deep thinker or maybe I just like entertainment.

With that said, last night I watched two movies.  It was snowing and nasty out, and I decided that I would spend the time with movies.  The first film was Coach Carter.  I thought I had watched this movie before, but parts of it did not sound familiar at all.

coach carterCoach Carter comes into a school to take on the coaching job of the basketball team.  He had attended that school and graduated, played basketball in college, and gone on to a successful career owning his own sporting goods store.  The school was run down and the kids are caught in the cycle that many inner city kids get caught in, and the cycle never seems to break.  Coach Carter, in his own way, tries to break that cycle.  He requires his players to sign a contract saying they will attend all of their classes, sit in the front row, wear a tie and jacket on game day, and maintain a 3.5 average.  The state only requires a 3.0 aver average.

At first there is much opposition to what he was trying to do, and when he locks the team out of the gym and cancels games because they are not living up to the terms of the contract, the parents go crazy.  “Basketball is all these kids have,” one of the parents said, and Coach Carter replied with, “and I am trying to give them more.”  He was trying to instill in them a sense of respect and a sense of pride.  They had given up, they had lost hope, they were trapped in the system, and he was trying to rescue them, one kid at a time.  What I was impressed by was the fact that he was trying to change them one person at a time.  He was not trying to change the system but only those kids on his team.

I thought about that movie, seriously thought deeply about it and about what we are trying to do here as Church.  We talk a lot about making a difference in people’s lives but do we actually do that?  Do we preach to transform or do we preach to survive?  Do we stay clear of controversial topics , so we do not upset the apple cart, or do we take them straight on?  Are we working to break the cycle, or are we just contributing to it?

In a recent conversation with fellow clergy, I made the statement that if we are not willing to have the difficult discussion about causes, and it does not matter what issue, poverty, abortion, hunger etc, there are root causes to all of these things.  If we are not willing to have the conversation then we truly have no business talking.  Yes,  we have to feed the hungry and clothe the naked but what are we doing about the causes of these issues?

Next up was a movie I had never heard of called Freedom Writers.  The story is about a first year teacher, Erin Gruwell, played by Hillary Swank,freedom writers who chooses to teach in a “voluntarily integrated” school in Long Beach California.  From the start of the movie one draws the conclusion that she has no idea what she is getting herself into and that the other teachers in the school resent this “voluntary integration.”

Erin is faced with a hostile classroom where the kids are separated by gangs along racial lines, with the exception of  one white kid in the room.  She tried her best and at one point in the movie one of the kids yells at her that she has no idea what it is like to grow up where they are growing up that they could be killed in gang violence at any moment , and their survival is what is uppermost on their list.  Once again we see kids trapped in a broken system with no hope of breaking free of it.

Just a word about systems.  I think that systems are vital.  We are able to do what we do here at the Church because of a system, the Food Bank network.  The problem with systems, as I see it, is that we trap people in them.  We create something , but we have no idea how to stop it and I think this goes back to my earlier comment that we are not willing to have the larger conversation about the causes of the problem.  In all of the debate about entitlements, or whatever you want to call them, there is no discussion about how to fix the need for such programs.

Ms. Gruell works hard to understand her kids.  When I was teaching in an inner city school, this was an essential part of getting through to them.  I remember one teacher who was screaming, and I do mean screaming, at a 4th grader who would not look her in the eye when she was talking to her.  The child was of Haitian culture and Haitians do not look authority figures in the eye.  If she had taken a half hour to read about Haitian culture she would have learned this, but she would rather yell at the kid.  I call that burnout by the way.

Eventually, she had them keep journals.  They could write about anything they wanted , but they had to write every day.  She would only read them if they wanted her to, but she would not grade them, only that they did the assignment of writing each day.  Through their writings,  she was able to come to an understanding about their lives, many of them by the way, took the bus more than two hours each day to school.  About their lives in gangs and what they have seen in their homes in their extremely short lives.  They had all been touched by gang violence, and all of them knew at least one person, killed because of gang violence.  She makes a difference in their lives with the hope that she can change their lives.

These are just two examples of the tens of thousands of talented teachers out there who are doing a extraordinarily difficult job under extremely difficult situations.  But what both of these stories point to is that we have to listen.

Not wanting to go to bed I watched an episode of West Wing.  Politics aside, West Wing was one of the best produced programs on television , and I liked it.  I watched the season three opener called Isaac and Ishmael.  The story begins with a lock down of the White House.  Trapped in the building is a group a high school kids, part of a program called Presidential Scholars.  They end up in the White House Mess and meet with various members of the administration, and the conversation turns to terrorism.  They are asking questions about why the terrorists hate us and they all have ideas why, but it comes down to the fact that we are pluralistic by design.  What extremists believe, and I do not care what kind of extremist it is, but extremists believe that their opinion is the only valid one and that all others do not even need to be listened to.  In a pluralistic society,  all opinions are valid, whether we agree with them or not.  I have often said that I might disagree with what you say, but I will fight to the death for your right to say it.

In the end, the character of Josh Lyman, tells one kids to keep talking and keep listening.  The problem we have as I see it, is we do not listen to each other.  Sure we are all talking, talking at once by the way, but are we listening.  Erin Gruwell thought she knew what she was doing in the classroom, but it was not until she listened, really listened to her students, that she was able to reach them.  Once the parents listened, and understood what Coach Carter was trying to do, they got behind him and helped him.  We need to listen.

We need to listen to people’s stories and get to know them.  I cannot stand to hear it when people vilify those who are on welfare or other programs.  Sure there is abuse and the system needs to be reformed, but take time and talk to people who are receiving benefits, get to know them , and their stories, step outside of your comfort zone and reach out it is astounding what you will learn about people if you just listen to their stories.

So what did I learn, I learned that we need to spend more times listening, I learned that we need to change the world, and it is the only way it will change, one person at a time.  We need to see people as individuals and not as their issue or their skin color, in other words, we need to be more Christ like and less judgmental, me included.

Saturday of the Dead

lastjudgement1

From the Synarxarion (Explanation) in the Triodion of

THE SATURDAY OF THE DEAD
Soul Saturday

(Celebrated this year on March 9th)

On this day, Soul Saturday, according to the order instituted by our Holy Fathers, we call to remembrance all those who have died from the beginning of the ages in faith and in the hope of the resurrection and of life eternal.

The present commemoration of the dead is based on the reality that many of our fathers and mothers, brothers and sisters died under such circumstances that funeral prayers and normal memorial services could not be offered for them. Either in a foreign land or on the seas, on impassable mountains or in gulfs or precipices, through starvation or diseases, in wars, in fires, or during earthquakes, and in so many other ways, perhaps in poverty or in need, our known and unknown brothers and sisters in Christ did not enjoy the chanting and necessary spiritual care. Therefore, our Holy Fathers, moved by their love for humanity, appointed the present celebration to take place in the Church everywhere, having received this from the Holy Apostles, so that all who have died through various mishaps or accidents may be remembered together, for the benefit of their souls. There is great profit to the soul from these memorials in the Church. This is the first reason.

The second reason is that since the Holy Fathers were going to place the memory of Christ’s Second Coming on the following day, Sunday, they appropriately commemorate the souls today, as it were, propitiating the fearful Judge, who cannot be deceived, to apply His usual compassion and to appoint them to the promised delight.

Furthermore, the Sunday following tomorrow is dedicated to Adam’s exile from Paradise, after which a new life is considered to begin for ourselves. Before this new beginning, the present memorial service has as its purpose to warn and frighten the living, so that they may meditate on their own death and proceed more diligently in the spiritual struggles of Great Lent. After their falling asleep, the Judgment shall follow by the Judge who cannot be bribed.

We always remember the souls of the dead on the Sabbath, for the Sabbath (Saturday) is the day of rest. In Hebrew, Sabbath literally means “rest.” As the Jews have this day for their repose and paused from every work and professional dealing, we Christians have it to remember the repose of our those who preceeded us. On this day, we hold memorial services and have koliva* blessed in the church, give alms, and perform various works of mercy. All these practices are of great benefit to the departed souls. Since the Orthodox Church does not celebrate Divine Liturgies on weekdays during Great Lent where the dead can be commemorated, the second, third, and fourth Saturdays of the Fast are designated as Soul Saturdays.

There are many proofs that the souls of the departed can be greatly benefited by what is done in their behalf. St. Marcarios the Egyptian once saw the dry skull of a pagan by the road on his way, and asked, saying, “Do you ever have any kind of consolation in Hades?” And the skull answered, “Yes, Father, especially when you pray for the sake of the dead; abundant is the comfort which we then enjoy.” The great man became very happy, because he always prayed for the dead and wished to be assured of the results of his intercessions.

Another saint, Gregory the Dialogist, saved the Roman Emperor Trajan through his prayers, although he heard from God never to pray like that on behalf of an impious non­Christian again. Also Theodora the Empress, by the prayers of the holy men and confessors, saved her husband, the iconoclast Emperor Theophilos abhorred by God, from the everlasting torments.

In his funeral oration to his brother Caesarios, St. Gregory the Theologian recommends alms on behalf of the reposed as being good. And the great Chrysostom in his commentary on Philippians says, “Let us think of ways to benefit the departed. Let us give them what help we can, namely almsgiving and offerings. For truly this brings them great advantage and very much gain and benefit. The custom of the priest commemorating those reposed in faith over the awesome Mysteries has not been without purpose nor arbitrarily ordained and delivered to God’s Church by His all-wise Disciples.” Again, “In making arrangements when you dispose of your property, together with your children and relatives, let your will also include the name of your Judge as a joint heir, and let not the mention of the poor be absent …”

St. Athanasius the Great also says that even if one has died and dissolved into the air, do not decline to provide oil and candles at the grave and to plead with Christ our God, for they are acceptable to God and bring great recompense: if the deceased was a sinner, that you may lose his sins; if righteous, that it may add to his reward. If one is a stranger without means, having no one to take care of these matters, God, being righteous and compassionate, will proportionately measure out to him His mercy, as He knows best. Moreover, he who offers such services to the dead also partakes of the reward, because he has shown love and concern for the salvation of his neighbor. It is as when one anoints a friend with perfumes, he receives the sweet aroma first. As for those who do not fulfill the wills and testaments of the deceased concerning these matters, they will positively be condemned.

Until Christ’s Second Coming, whatever is done for the souls of the dead is beneficial, as the Fathers say, particularly to those who had done some small good deeds when they were among the living. Even if the divine Scriptures declare certain things as needed for the chastening of the majority, yet as a rule God’s love for man prevails. For if the balance of good and shameful deeds is even, God’s love for man prevails. If the scale is weighed down a little by evil deeds, again His exceeding goodness prevails.

In the other life, everyone will be acquainted even with those whom they have never seen before, as the divine Chrysostom says, deducing this from the parable of the rich man and Lazarus. All will recognize each other, but not from any bodily characteristics. For all shall be one age, and traits from birth will be absent. Rather, we shall recognize each other through the soul’s spiritual eyes, as St.Gregory the Theologian says in his funeral oration to Caesarios: “Then I shall see Caesarios, beaming with joy and glorious, such as you have often appeared to me in my dreams, O most beloved of brothers.”

St. Athanasios the Great also says in his homily on the dead that until the time of the universal resurrection it has been granted to the saints to recognize each other and revel together, while the sinners, on the other hand, have been deprived even of this. Regarding the holy martyrs, they are capable of observing our actions and even of visiting us. Then all shall know one another when the hidden secrets of every man shall be revealed.

We should know that, for the time being, the souls of the righteous dwell in certain places set aside for them, and the souls of the sinners in their own location. The former rejoice in their hope, but the latter grieve in expectation of future suffering. Therefore, the saints have not yet received the promised blessings, according to the words of the Holy Apostle Paul, who says, “God having provided something better for us, that they should not be made perfect apart from us” (Heb. 11:40).

We should also know that not all who have suffered death by various accidents (falling down from precipices, being burned in fires, being sunk in seas, or perishing by starvation, poison, frost, and so on) have had such an end as a result of God’s command. For these are God’s judgments: some occur with His approval, others by His permission. Still others occur as a warning, a threat, or a chastisement. By foreknowledge He knows and is aware of everything, and everything occurs by His will, as with the sparrows about which the Holy Gospel speaks. He does not order that, for example, one man is to die by drowning and another to die normally, one as an old man and the other as an infant. But once and for all He determined — with some exceptions — the general times and various kinds of death in man. Within these constraints do the various means of death occur, without God’s determining them precisely from the beginning, only knowing. But in relation to the life of each and every person, God’s will plans the time and the manner of each one’s death.

St. Basil the Great speaks about the limits of man’s life, although he is alluding to God’s words, “For dust you are, and to dust you shall return” (Gen. 3:19). St. Paul also writes to the Corinthians, “For he who eats and drinks in an unworthy manner eats and drinks judgment to himself, not discerning the Lord’s body. For this reason many are weak and sick among you, and many sleep” (1 Cor. 11:29-30). Here the word sleep refers to death. The Holy Prophet David says, “Do not take me away in the midst of my days. Your years are throughout all generations”(Ps. 101:25). Again, “You have made my days a few spans, and my existence is nothing in your sight” (Ps. 38:6). The Holy King Solomon says, “Son, honor your father, that you may live many years, and not die before your time” (Ecclus 3:5-6). And the Lord himself, speaking to Eliphaz the Temanite, says, “For I will accept him, lest I deal with you according to your folly; because you have not spoken of Me what is right, as my servant Job has” (Job 42:8).

Hence it is evident that there is no set term of life. Or, if there is one, it is whatever God wills. For as He so wishes He adds to or deletes from the time of the life of this or that individual, administering all things for our benefit. And when He so wills, God arranges both the place and the time of repose. According to St. Athanasios the Great, the term of each person’s life is set by the will and counsel of God: “Through the depths of Thy judgments shalt Thou care for all, O Christ.” According to St. Basil the Great, death comes as soon as the term of life has been fulfilled; by the words term of life, God’s will is meant. For if the term of life had already been determined, then for what do we need God, or even a physician? And why do we pray for our children?

One ought to know that baptized infants who die shall enjoy the bliss of Paradise; those not baptized and those of the heathen shall go neither to the place of bliss nor to Hades.

When the soul has left the body, it no longer has any concern for earthly things but is continually concerned with matters in the next life.

We celebrate the first memorial service on the third day after death, because by the third day the dead one’s appearance is altered. We serve the second memorial service on the ninth day after death, because by this day the entire body is dissolved, except for the heart. We serve the third memorial service on the fortieth day, for by this day the heart has deteriorated. The same progression, in reverse order, is made at birth: by the third day after conception the heart is formed; by the ninth day the flesh is fashioned, and by the fortieth day the full form appears.

O Master Christ, set the souls of Your departed servants
in the tabernacles of Your righteous,
and have mercy upon us and save us,
as You are the only Immortal One. Amen.

 

_________________________________

*Offering koliva at the memorial services is a practice which can be traced to the middle of the fourth century. In earlier times, bread and wine with olives, cheese, or rice were offered in charity, and those who partook of them would pray, “Blessed be his memory.” This is why in the Greek Orthodox tradition, these funeral meals are called Makaria, or Blessings. A continuation of this ancient custom are the luncheons and light refreshments offered today by the relatives of the deceased to those who prayed with them at the Memorial Services.

Koliva is wheat or rice cooked with honey or sugar and sometimes mixed with figs, raisins, nuts, and other sweets. The grain and fruit brought to the commemoration of the dead signifies that the dead will truly rise again from the grave, for both grain, which is sown in the earth, and fruit, which is laid on the earth, decays first and afterwards brings forth abundant ripe, whole fruit. The honey or sugar used in the koliva signifies that after the resurrection of the Orthodox and the righteous, there awaits a joyous and blessed life in the Heavenly Kingdom and not a bitter or sorrowful one. The koliva prepared from grain expresses the faith of the living in the resurrection of the dead to a better life, just as that seed, having fallen upon the ground, although undergoing corruption, yet grows to attain a better appearance.

Why Conservative Christians Should Oppose Teaching the Bible in Public Schools

(AP) A Bible class at Woodland High School in Cartersville, Ga.
(AP) A Bible class at Woodland High School in Cartersville, Ga.

 ~ Religion News Service

On Sunday night, the long awaited mini-series “The Bible” premiered on the History Channel. Produced by reality TV mogul Mark Burnett of “Survivor” fame and former “Touched by an Angel” star Roma Downey in an effort to dramatize key stories from Scripture, the series is already being embraced by Christians nationwide. After all, when is the last time “Hagar” was trending on twitter?

Two days before the first episode aired, however, the couple penned a controversial opinion column in The Wall Street Journal titled, “Why Public Schools Should Teach the Bible.” They argued that public schools should encourage or perhaps mandate teaching courses on the sacred book. This should apparently top the list of priorities in a time when America’s educational system is faced with depleting resources and failing to keep up with the rest of the world’s students.

Christian pastors and leaders in social media lauded Burnett and Downey’s article as wise and appropriate. And while the timing of publication could not have been more perfect—the article reads like a thinly veiled marketing piece with a commercial for the television show inserted as the seventh paragraph—the  arguments are worth considering.

Should Christians support teaching the Bible in America’s public schools?

The answer as I see it is a resounding “no” and not because I don’t agree with some of Burnett and Downey’s reasoning. Yes, the Bible has been a primary document of Western civilization. Yes, it is bursting with widely applicable wisdom and knowledge. But, no, Christians should still not support it being taught in public schools.

Too much of this debate has centered around the question of if teaching the Bible is appropriate in a public school setting, but few recognize that the question of how is far more contentious. The strongest support for implementing such a curriculum comes presumably from conservative evangelicals who mostly claim to read the Scriptures literally. They assume the Bible would be taught accordingly, but it most certainly will not.

According to a recent Gallup Poll, only 3 in 10 Americans say they read the Bible literally. Seventeen percent say the Bible is a book of fables or legends. And those who believe the Bible is “the word of God” decreases as their education level increases.

Those who teach these courses will most likely be non-literalists trained at secular state universities, not homeschooled conservative evangelicals or Bible college graduates. They may believe that the many “seeming contradictions” of the Bible are actual ones. If asked, they may teach students that the stories of “Jonah and the Whale” or “Noah’s Ark” are mythic allegories, rather than historical accounts of miraculous events.

Do the Christians crying for a reintroduction of Bible courses want their children taught, for example, that the creation account in Genesis is little more than pretty poetry? It’s safe to assume they do not. But most haven’t thought this deeply about the issue.

Conservative Christians should know better than to advocate for such courses. After all, they have long decried the well-documented “liberalizing effect” of public college and universities who offer similar courses. Many conservative Christians leave home for college, take an introduction to religion course, and return with an entirely different worldview than their parents hold. Do they want the same experience with their seventh graders?

Support for teaching the Bible is not merely an obscure position held only by fringe conservatives. Last year, a poll conducted by conservative news outlet The Blaze found that 74% of the 1,658 respondents supported reading the Bible during class time. The outcry swelled in the wake of the Newtown shootings when some Americans wondered if prayer and Bible reading should be reintroduced into schools. When those elements were present, they reasoned, we didn’t have tragedies such as Newtown and Columbine. (Proponents failed to recognize that school systems in many wildly secular countries like Canada haven’t faced an epidemic of violence either.)

But if those conservatives who advocate for such a shift in public education get their way—and it is admittedly an unlikely scenario at best—it will likely be another case of getting what they want and then not wanting what they get. By advocating for teaching the bible in schools, Christians are unwittingly lobbying for something they could never accept. They think they want it, but they really don’t.

As a lifelong evangelical, I’ve experienced firsthand the value of Biblical literacy. But in the end, this sacred text is best encountered where it can be taught according to the beliefs of individual faith communities. In homes and houses of worship, and for the next nine Sundays, on the History Channel.

Jonathan is a faith and culture writer whose hundreds of articles have appeared in outlets like USA Today, The Atlantic, and National Journal. His most recent book is “A Faith of Our Own: Following Jesus Beyond the Culture Wars.”

error: Content is protected !!