23 September ~ The Conception of St. John the Baptist

This came to pass fifteen months before the birth of Christ, after the vision of the Angel that Zacharias, the father of the Forerunner, saw in the Temple while he executed the priest’s office in the order of his course during the feast of the Tabernacles, as tradition bears witness. In this vision, the Archangel Gabriel appeared to Zacharias and said to him, “Thy prayer is heard; and thy wife Elizabeth shall bear thee a son, and thou shalt call his name John” (Luke 1:13). Knowing that Elizabeth was barren, and that both he and she were elderly, Zacharias did not believe what the Angel told him, although he had before him the example of Abraham and Sarah, of Hannah, mother of the Prophet Samuel, and of other barren women in Israel who gave birth by the power of God. Hence, he was condemned by the Archangel to remain speechless until the fulfilment of these words in their season, which also came to pass (Luke 1:7-24).

Apolytikion in the Fourth Tone

Rejoice, O thou barren one who hadst not borne until now; for lo, in all truth thou hast conceived the lamp of the Sun, and he shall send forth his light over all the earth, which is afflicted with blindness. Dance, O Zacharias, and cry out with great boldness: The one to be born is the blest Prophet of God Most High.

Kontakion in the First Tone

Great Zacharias now doth rejoice with resplendence; Elizabeth his glorious yoke-mate exulteth; for she hath conceived divine John the Forerunner worthily, whom the great Archangel had announced with rejoicing, whom, as it is meet, we men revere as a sacred initiate of grace divine.

From www.goarch.org

19 September ~ Theodore of Tarsus

Archbishop of Canterbury. AD 602-690.

A native of Tarsus in Cilicia, Theodore was born about AD 602. Having studied in Athens, he visited Rome and, whilst there, was appointed by Pope Vitalian to the See of Canterbury, which had been vacant for four years. Theodore arrived in England in AD 669 and was well received everywhere. He was the first Archbishop whose authority the whole English Church was willing to acknowledge…

The aims which Theodore set before himself were the organization of the Church and the encouragement of learning. He therefore consecrated Bishops to fill the vacant Sees and subdivided the existing Dioceses.

Wilfrid, who at this time ruled all the Church north of the Humber, resisted the attempt to deprive him of any part of his Diocese; but although on his appeal to Rome, the papal decision was given in his favour, Theodore proceeded with the subdivision of the Northumbrian episcopate. Shortly before his death, he was reconciled to Wilfrid, who was restored to his See.

The diocesan system which Theodore sought to establish was accepted by a Synod of the united English Church held at Hertford in AD 673. Another Synod, held at Hatfield in 680, affirmed the adhesion of the English Church to the Catholic Faith.

The enlightened zeal of Theodore allowed learning to flourish in England. Under his direction, and with the able help of Hadrian and Benedict Biscop, seminaries were founded at many of the Monasteries. Theodore died on 19th September AD 690.

Welcome

Welcome tho those who have come here for the first time. Yesterday this blog saw well over 100 hits for the first time! Most of you came for the article on Catholic Orthodox Unity and some of you left comments. Very Cool!

I hope you return and tell your friends!

Pictures and Signs

Earlier in the week I wrote about the signs from the Tea Party is Washington, DC in fact it was that post that I used as the base of my weekly column. As I was surfing around the many blogs I read each day, thanks to Google reader, I came across a post on Fr. Philip Powell’s blog. Thanks to Fr. Philip for writing about this topic and I will use his thoughts as a jump off point. I recommend his blog to you.

On September 11th pro-life advocate Jim Pouillon was murdered in Michigan. This did not get the same press coverage as the doctor who was killed last year but none the less he was murdered for his pro-life activities by a person who was upset with his message. How ironic it is that a pro-life advocate was killed for being pro-life…

California Catholic Daily has an article this week by Father Thomas Eutenerer, president of Human Life International about the killing and at the end of the article the newspaper printed some comments received by the local TV station regarding the killing. Most of the comments focused on the signs that some people hold at anti-abortion events.

Fr. Philip focused on one of the comments and I will do the same. “I’ve never seen this man before, but I’ve seen others like him. The signs are so offensive that the issue becomes about the sign instead of being about abortion. He hurts the pro-life cause and I’m glad that he’s gone.” Okay aside from the fact that the person ends the statement with “I’m glad that he’s gone” what do the signs say about the movement, whatever movement it may be?

I took exception to the signs linking Pres. Obama with Hitler and other Nazi signs that some of the Tea Party folks were holding and I guess I would take exception to some of the signs that anti-abortion folks hold as well. Sings depicting aborted babies and other graphic images hurt the pro-life movement as much as the Nazi signs hurt the Tea Party movement. I agree with one part of the above quoted statement, “The signs are so offensive that the issue becomes about the sign instead of being about abortion” The media focuses on the signs because that is what they see. The media focused on the Nazi signs because they are so incendiary that is what gets the attention. The same is true with anti-abortion signs.

I agree with Fr. Philip that these signs hurt the cause more than help it. I am, and I have said this in public ans here on the blog, pro-life in all that that term means. I attended my first March for Life in Washington, DC this past January and had a great, prayerful experience and plan to go again this year. Just as I will not associate with the Tea Party movement any longer because of the signs being held in DC I have my doubts about the pro-life movement as well. However I did not see many incendiary sings in DC but I have seen them in the past.

Here in Worcester there is a clinic the performs abortions and next door is a rescue office. In the office is a chapel where Catholic Mass and Orthodox services as well as protestant service are held. The rosary is said daily, and once a month an Orthodox service is said on a Saturday morning. I have participated twice in this service. This is what we should be doing. This is the kind of activity that we should be participating in. By hold signs that show aborted babies we are no better than the folks carrying the signs of Pres Obama and Speaker Pilosi as Hitler!

As I said in the post about the Tea Party, this is the minority of people but, as it did with the Tea Party, we all get associated with them and that is not good. There is not justification for murder on any level. We are all created in the image and likeness of God and have the Divine Spark and murder is wrong. But let’s tone things down a little and take a breath. March, yes! Pray, most defiantly, but keep the signs at home.

Tea Party

If you are a longtime reader of this blog you know that I participated in a protest in the spring that had been organized by the Tea Party folks. I believed then as I believe now that we need to make some changes in the way Washington is doing things. I have now decided that I can no longer participate in events organized by this group. I have a fundamental disagreement with people who try and Make anyone out to be a Nazi or try and compare someone to Hitler. There is no room in my world for people who ave to stoop to this level of protest. I had also decided that after I gave up my radio show I would not make political comments on this blog anymore, however after the Tea Party in Washington and the Congressman’s outburst during the President’s speech I will make some final (ya right) political comments.

Now I know that not everyone who was at the Tea Party is not a hater and I also know that the two pictures I have posted below are just tow of thousands of signs, but they speak volumes. The organizers of such events and everyone who was there needs to distance themselves from the hatred that is being spewed by some of your comrades. Sorry for the use of that word. Here are some photos of signs, again I know that the vast majority of people do not subscribe to the hatred but it has to stop.

Is anyone else bothered by the Nazi references to the President of the United States? I think people need to go back and read their history before they make references to someone who tried to exterminate and entire race of people. Again I know it is not the vast majority of people who attended the Tea Party but those who have need to denounce this kind of hatred and trash! This is not helpful in a discussion.

Now before you jump on me and talk about how the left went after George Bush read back through the blog and find my comments on hatred in general. I do not think hatred toward anyone is healthy. I did not like it when the left attacked President Bush anymore than the way the left is attacking President Obama. I have heard people say that because they (the left) attacked Pres. Bush we (the right) are going to attack Pres Obama. Now that is an adult way to carry on a conversation!

We all need to take a step back, take a deep breath, and stop all of the hate. We definitely need to stop the Nazi references as that is very destructive and monumentally disingenuous to all of those who lost their lives because of what Hitler did. The people who made the signs should be ashamed of themselves and those who do not speak out against it should also be ashamed of themselves. March, yes disagree, yes let your voice be heard, yes but we are a civilized country and all this does is lower the level of debate and what we should be doing is raising the level of debate.

Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi has been quoted saying ” Be the change you want to see in the world” If we want the change to be what is displayed in the signs that is great go for it but I don’t think that is what you want. I also believe it discredits what everyone else is trying to do.

Margaret Mead, the American Cultural Anthropologist said, “Never underestimate the power of a small dedicated group of people to change the world-indeed, its the only thing that ever has” We do need change, but what kind of change do we want? Do we want the hate or do we want a great debate on the issues? You Decide!

PS: Hate filled comments and comments that do not advance the discussion will be deleted. If you don’t like this policy then get your own blog and write whatever you want. Haters are not welcome here.

Photos from here

Catholic Orthodox Unity?

Thanks to the many bloggers who have posted the link to this article in the National Catholic Register. For those of you who have not seen it check it out here.

It seems the Roman Catholic Archbishop of Moscow has said that unity between Rome and the Orthodox world is “within a few months.” Well as much as many of us hope and pray that one day this will be true I hate to disagree with His Eminence but I do not think that is possible.

I do not think the day will ever come that the church will be “one” again from an administrative position. I think we might achieve Communion of sorts as we have seen with other churches but unification is not possible. Too much time has passed and there are far too many differences to be reconciled for unity to be achieved. I know miracles can happen but this would be a big one!

At the present time in the Orthodox world there are 9 Patriarchs and 6 heads of recognized Autocephalous Churches. If we include Rome there would be 10 Patriarchs. Yes we Orthodox do recognize the Pope of Rome as a Patriarch and dare I say would say that he is first among equals. Laying aside all other theological problems the Universal Jurisdiction of the Roman Pontiff would cause quite a problem for the others in the club.

Trying to get the Orthodox to agree on something is sort of like herding cats. Oh we talk a good game but when it come down to it a turf war begins. Here in the US for example we have the Standing Conference of the Canonical Orthodox Bishops in the Americas (SCOBA). This group recognizes 10 Jurisdictions in the United States and Canada. These are the Canonical Orthodox Churches in the Americas. Now some of you who read this blog do not belong to one of these Jurisdictions yet claim to be canonical. I cannot accept that nor would the majority of Orthodox in the US. So that is one problem. The other is if we cannot get these 10 bishops to agree how are we going to get a multitude of bishops to agree. Administrative unity is something that has been a goal in the US for many many years and sometimes is within the grasp but them slips away.

We have a bishop for example that does not like what a lay person is writing on his blog about him. He asks the lay persons bishop to sanction him and tell to stop writing. Bishop cannot do this after all this is not Soviet Russia. Other bishops stops his feet and pulls his seminarians out of the other bishops seminaries a week before classes begin. One of these very seminarians had just moved into an apartment and his wife was GREAT with child! So off they go on the move. This is the kind of silliness that should end.

I could go on but suffice it to say we have a long way to go before we can talk about unifying with anyone outside of the Orthodox family. Let’s talk about uniting the family we have before we invite anyone else to join.

Elevation of the Cross

The Elevation of the Cross, celebrated on the fourteenth of September, commemorates the finding of Christ’s Cross by Saint Helen, the mother of the Emperor Constantine in the fourth century; and, after it was taken by the Persians, of its recovery by the Emperor Heraclius in the seventh century at which time it was “elevated” in the Church of the Resurrection in Jerusalem. From this latter event the “universal elevation” of the Cross was celebrated annually in all of the churches of the Christian Empire.

The day of the Elevation of the Cross became, as it were, the national holiday of the Eastern Christian Empire similar to the Fourth of July in the United States. The Cross, the official emblem of the Empire which was placed on all public buildings and uniforms, was officially elevated on this day by the bishops and priests. They blessed the four directions of the universe with the Cross, while the faithful repeated the chanting of “Lord have mercy.” This ritual is still done in the churches today after the solemn presentation and elevation of the Cross at the end of the Vigil service of the holy day following the Great Doxology of Matins.

The troparion of the feast which was, one might say, the “national anthem” sung on all public occasions in the Christian Empires of Byzantium and Russia, originally petitioned God to save the people, to grant victory in war and to preserve the empire “by the virtue of the Cross.” Today the troparion, and all the hymns of the day, are “spiritualized” as the “adversaries” become the spiritually wicked and sinful including the devil and his armies, and “Orthodox Christians” replace the names of ruling officials of the Empire.

O Lord, save Thy people and bless Thine inheritance. Grant victories to the Orthodox Christians over their adversaries; and by the virtue of Thy Cross, preserve Thy habitation (Troparion).

As Thou was mercifully crucified for our sake, grant mercy to those who are called by Thy name; make all Orthodox Christians glad by Thy power, granting them victories over their adversaries, by bestowing on them the invincible trophy, Thy weapon of peace (Kontakion).

The holy day of the Elevation of the Cross, although it has an obviously “political” origin, has a place of great significance in the Church today. It remains with us as a day of fasting and prayer, a day when we recall that the Cross is the only sign worthy of our total allegiance, and that our salvation comes not by “victories” of any earthly sort but by the only true and lasting victory of the crucifixion of Christ and our coÄcrucifixion with him.

When we elevate the Cross and bow down before it in veneration and worship to God, we proclaim that we belong to the Kingdom “not of this world,” and that our only true and enduring citizenship is with the saints in the “city of God” (Eph 2:19; Heb 11:10; Rev 21-22).

The first Old Testamental reading of the Vespers of the day tells of the “tree” which changes the bitter waters into sweetness — the symbol of the Tree of the Cross (Ex 15:22-16:1). The second reading reminds us that the Lord chastens and corrects those whom he loves and that Divine Wisdom is “a Tree of life to those who lay hold upon her and trust in her, as in the Lord” (Prov 3:11-18). Again the reference is to the Cross which is, as the epistle reading of the day proclaims, “to those who are called … the power of God and the wisdom of God” (1 Cor 18-25).

The third Old Testament reading is from the Prophecy of Isaiah which tells of the “city of the Lord” where both Jews and Gentiles will live together and “shall bow themselves down” at the place of God’s feet and “shall know that I the Lord am Thy Saviour and Thy Redeemer, the mighty One of Israel” (Isaiah 60:11-16). Here we have the direct reference to God’s city where men shall worship at his feet; and together with the psalm line repeated constantly during the services which calls us to “bow before his footstool,” we have once again the reference to the Holy Cross (Ps 99:5, 110:1, et al.).

Before the Cross, we bow down in worship, O Master, and Thy holy resurrection, we glorify (Hymn of Veneration before the Cross).

This central hymn of the Elevation of the Cross which lasts for eight days in the Church is sung many times. It replaces the Thrice-Holy of the Divine Liturgy. The normal antiphons are also replaced by special verses from the psalms which have direct reference to Christ’s crucifixion on the Cross (Ps 22, 74, 99). At the Matins, in the gospel reading from St John, Christ says that when he is elevated on the Cross he will draw all men to himself (Jn 12:28-36). The long gospel reading at the Divine Liturgy is the passion account from this same gospel.

Thus, at the Elevation of the Cross the Christians make their official rededication to the crucified Lord and pledge their undivided allegiance to him by the adoration of his holy feet nailed to the lifeÄcreating Cross. This is the meaning of this holy day of fasting and repentance in the Church today.

From http://www.oca.org/

The Glory of the Cross

V. Rev. Fr. Nicholas Apostola
Pastor, St. Nicholas Orthodox Church
Guest Blogger

This is the Sunday before the Universal Exaltation of the Precious Cross. The Epistle Lesson is take from St. Paul’s Letter to the Galatians, 6:11-18. In this passage, as well as throughout the whole Letter, St. Paul’s emphasis is on “the Cross of Christ.” In part, this explains why we read this portion of his Letter today.

St. Paul was writing the Galatians about the negative influence a group of Jewish converts to Christ was having on their community. Galatia was a province located in north central Asia Minor, present-day Turkey. The larger cities of Galatia contained a mixed population of locals as well as Greeks and Romans. Greek and Latin was the language there. In the more rural areas the population was largely Galatians, who were related to the Celts and spoke a language more akin to Celtic than the languages of their neighbors.

Today’s reading is the close of St. Paul’s Letter to them. It begins: “See with what large letters I am writing to you with my own hand.” (v. 11) St. John Chrysostom believes that this indicates that St. Paul had written the whole Letter himself, rather than leave the task to a scribe. For him, this was an indication of the intense concern Paul had about the situation, and for the Galatians themselves. Modern scholars think that the first part of the Letter was given to a scribe to write and that St. Paul wrote this part by way of emphasis. Either way, St. Paul is clearly upset and concerned.

Here is the reason: “It is those who want to make a good showing in the flesh that would compel you to be circumcised, and only in order that they may not be persecuted for the cross of Christ. For even those who receive circumcision do not themselves keep the law, but they desire to have you circumcised that they may glory in your flesh.” (v. 12-13)

It might seem odd to us that what we do today for largely medical reasons was a deeply religious question in the early Church. However, according to the Mosaic Law, the primary sign of the covenant between the Children of Israel and God was circumcision. It was and still is what defines Jews as a Chosen People. For St. Paul, to accept circumcision was to subject yourself to the Old Covenant. It was a step backward.

St. Paul’s contention was that these people had no interest in truly proclaiming the Good News of Christ’s coming. Rather, they wanted these Galatians to undergo a ritual that was largely for show, while ignoring the true internal spiritual transformation that should occur in those who follow the Lord. These were fundamentalists who rather than stand up for Christ — which would have probably subjected them to persecution — took the ‘zealous’ route that would make them look devout, but really cost them nothing. This is what’s behind the statement: “they desire to have you circumcised that they may glory in your flesh.”

His answer to these ‘missionaries’ is: “But far be it from me to glory except in the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ, by which the world has been crucified to me, and I to the world. For neither circumcision counts for anything, nor uncircumcision, but a new creation.” (v. 14-15) By the “cross” St. Paul means the whole ‘economy’ of our salvation; the whole of God’s plan for us culminating in the Lord’s death and resurrection. He also means the cross that every Christian takes up when they decide to follow Christ. The ‘world’ that has been crucified to him is the world of sin and excess; the passions that lead away from God. This should be the cross that we ourselves pick up, choosing against sin and for the Lord.

St. Paul then offers a blessing: “Peace and mercy be upon all who walk by this rule, upon the Israel of God.” (v. 16) He is sending two subtle messages in this blessing. He is saying that those who follow the ‘rule,’ that is, who choose the newness of Christ over the ‘dead end’ of the Law, will receive God’s peace and mercy. And, by referring to the ‘Israel of God’ he is at once answering his critics — the Judaizers — that he is not ‘Jewish’ enough, and asserting that the ‘Israel of God’ is now the followers of Christ.

Expressing his exasperation with the Judaizers, he says: “Henceforth let no man trouble me; for I bear on my body the marks of Jesus.” (v. 17) The word translated here as “marks” is, in Greek, “stigmata.” Because of how we use ‘stigmata’ today, it has led some people to speculate that St. Paul had on his body the crucifixion wounds of Christ. However, in the ancient world this word meant something like “branding.” It was used for the branding marks burned into slaves and cattle. It is more likely that St. Paul means the very real scars on his body that were the result of the multiple floggings he had received. Anyone who has seen photographs of the backs of slaves who had been flogged will immediately understand what he is talking about. His scars mark him as belonging to Christ.

He finishes this rather harsh Letter with a blessing: “The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ be with your spirit, brethren. Amen.” (v. 18) The words that he chooses, and especially using as the very final word the affectionate term ‘brethren’ — brothers and sister — he wants to soften whatever hurt they might be feeling, and let them know that from his perspective all is healed.

As we reflect on St. Paul’s words, we should recommit ourselves to take up our cross and follow the Lord as St. Paul did.

10 September ~ St. Finian

Irish abbot, a disciple of Sts. Colman and Mochae also called Winin. He was born in Strangford, Lough, Ulster, in Ireland, a member of a royal family. Studying under Sts. Colman and Mochae, he became a monk in Strathclyde and was ordained in Rome. Returning to Ulster, Finian founded several monasteries, becoming abbot of Moville, in County Down, Ireland. He became embroiled with St. Columba, a student, over a copy of St. Jerome’s Psalter, and St. Columba had to surrender that copy to Finian. He also founded Holywood and Dumfries in Scotland. Finian was known for miracles, including moving a river.
error: Content is protected !!