12th Sunday After Pentecost

1 Corinthians 15:1-11

Matthew 19:16-26

I have been thinking the last few months on the theme of forgiveness and reconciliation. I spent a great deal of time this weekend watching the funeral rites of Senator Edward M Kennedy of Massachusetts. I also spent some time in reflection on the comments that the so called religious people were making during the funeral on Twitter and on the Internet via the various blogs that I read. I thought the funeral was a mixture of Catholic Ritual and State Funeral as it should have been but the liturgy was not what I focused on it was the comments about his personal life and his voting record.

Now I freely admit that around the issues of abortion he had a terrible record and I do not need to go into my feelings on that subject here you can just search around on this blog for my feeling on abortion. There were also comments made about Chappaquiddick, again not going into that here. There are plenty of places one can turn to for commentary on all of that. All I know is that there were only two people that really know what happened and neither of them are talking anymore.

So I turned to the notion of what is the capacity of God to forgive? Is there a sin so unforgivable that even God will not forgive? Scripture tells us that blasphemy against the Holy Spirit will do it but that is about it. As an Orthodox Christian and as a priest that heard confessions I have faith that if the person is truly sorry for all that they have done then God will forgive them. It is not my place to judge their sincerity that is for God alone. No one knows what was said in the final days of his life to his priest, and we know one was present, and I hold out hope that perhaps, like all of us, we examined out conscious and asked for forgiveness for all the we have done.

Also as a priest I feel we have the duty to bury the dead. By all accounts Senator Kennedy was a baptized Christian and therefore he should be given the honor of a Christian burial. I do not think there is a caveat in the ritual that says if he was a scoundrel he should not get the rite.

In the end, he wrote a letter to the Pope and asked President Obama to deliver it. No press release was sent out with the contents of the letter nor was one sent out when the reply was received. It was read at the burial service and it moved me to tears. Here was a man facing the end and it sounds to me like he was repentant for all that he had done. He tried his best, and although he fell short, asked for prayers. Read the letter here.

As a Christian I believe in a God who has the capacity to forgive all if we ask and are sincere in our repentance. If I would believe any other way that I would be putting limits on God and we know that God has no limits. A mirror is a very difficult thing to look in sometime and perhaps that is what was going on here with people and their comments. I will pray for all of the haters out there on both sides, and there are many believe me. A measure of a man is not on a single issue but rather a life time of service to humanity. “Well done good and faithful servant” These are the words we all hope to hear.

Edward Kennedy Rest in Peace!

30 August ~ St. Ayle

Ayle was one of the outstanding group of Irish missionaries who took the faith into the countries of the European continent. The leader of this group was St. Columbanus of Bobbio. Ayle accompanied St. Eustace to Bavaria where he became the pioneer missionary noted both for personal devotion and scholarship. He then penetrated to the further side of the Jura mountains to preach but returned to end his life preaching in Bavaria. He died about 650, near Meaux, aged 66.

It is not known why Ayle’s cult became popular in Scotland. The abbey of Balmerino in north FIfe, and Anstruther in the south of the country both have evidence of the influence of the cult of St. Ayle: there are chapels dedicated to him at Balmerino and at Anstruther-Easter, which also had St. Ayle’s croft and house. His n ame is found in several spellings: Yle, Yzle and eve Teal, the usual name for him in Balmerino. Here the last letter of the word saint has become affixed to the name. There is also Killmayaille in Kintyre with an ancient site.

A.P. Forbes, Kalendars of Scottish Saints, 1872

So We Preach, and So You Believe

V. Rev. Fr. Nicholas Apostola
Pastor, St. Nicholas Orthodox Church
Guest Blogger

This is the twelfth Sunday after Pentecost and we continue reading from St. Paul’s First Letter to the Corinthians, specifically 1 Corinthians 15:1-11. We should remember that the Corinthian community was composed of many volatile elements. While some were Jewish converts, others had been pagan and only recently acquainted with the Hebrew Scriptures. All were heavily influenced by the wide variety of philosophical and religious beliefs current in cosmopolitan Corinth. In this letter St. Paul is attempting to correct their thinking; to bring them back to the principles of faith that he had originally taught them.

In verse 12 and what follows, St. Paul tells us that some of the Corinthians had begun to question the belief in the bodily resurrection of Christ, and their own at the time of the second coming. Others believed that the “resurrection” had already occurred, that is, Christ, having risen from the dead, inaugurated the new world; they were living the “resurrected” existence in the here and now. This is the background for what he writes in today’s lesson.

St. Paul reminds the Corinthians of the gospel that he preached to them, and that they accepted to live by. He said that in believing in Christ’s gift of salvation, they should “hold it fast–unless [they] believed in vain.” (v. 1-2) He reiterates for them the very center of our Christian faith: “For I delivered to you as of first importance what I also received, that Christ died for our sins in accordance with the scriptures, that he was buried, that he was raised on the third day in accordance with the scriptures.” (v. 3-4) In these two verses St. Paul makes four very important points.

The first is that Christ died. To say that he died means that he was born, was human, and was susceptible to all of the frailties of our condition.

The second is that he died and was buried. This means that there was no illusion about his death. This was not the figment of someone’s imagination, or simply a story told. To be buried means that everyone who saw it believed he was dead.

The third is that this all occurred according to the scriptures, meaning the Old Testament, the Psalms, the Prophecies, and the other writings. Most of these were well known among Jewish religious scholars. The Lord himself quoted some. Others are given to us by St. Paul and the other New Testament authors.

The fourth, and most important, is that he rose from the dead on the third day. St. Paul says, “If Christ has not been raised, then our preaching is in vain and your faith is in vain.” (v. 14) Christ’s resurrection from the dead is the cornerstone of our faith.

He again reminds the Corinthians of the witnesses to Christ’s rising. “He appeared to Cephas [i.e., Peter], then to the twelve. Then he appeared to more than five hundred brethren at one time, most of whom are still alive, though some have fallen asleep. Then he appeared to James, then to all the apostles. Last of all, as to one untimely born, he appeared also to me.” (v. 5-8)

St. Paul references many people, most of whom were still alive at his writing. These are concrete witnesses to both the Lord’s death on the Cross, and his resurrection afterward. St. Paul, who did not witness him dead, nonetheless did experience the Lord on the road to Damascus. These eyewitnesses are the ones on whom our faith is grounded. When he says: “I delivered to you . . . what I also received,” he wants to remind them that he did not invent the story, nor was he the only witness. Many saw and many believed.

We should take note that St. Paul does not mention Mary Magdalene, the other Myrrh-bearing women, and especially his own Mother as witnesses, even though Tradition and Scripture has it that he appeared first to his Mother, then to the other women, and then to the other disciples gathered in the upper room. The reason for St. Paul’s omission is simple. He is speaking as a Jew to other Jews. In those days (however we might think of it today) by Jewish Law only the witness of men was valid; women’s witness had no authority; hence the omission. St. Paul’s intension is to bolster his argument with what others would consider to be authentic verification. He wanted to give credence to the most important things, the facts themselves and those who could verify them.

In the list of “witnesses” he mentions himself as the last of all: “For I am the least of the apostles, unfit to be called an apostle, because I persecuted the church of God.” (v. 9) He doesn’t want to aggrandize himself. He simply states the facts. “By the grace of God I am what I am, and his grace toward me was not in vain. On the contrary, I worked harder than any of them, though it was not I, but the grace of God which is with me.” (v. 10)

Here is St. Paul’s central point: “Whether then it was I or they, so we preach and so you believed.” (v. 11) In one sense it does not matter who tells you the “good news;” the preacher is irrelevant. It is the truth of the message that matters. You verify the truth of the story from your own experience of God’s truth in the witness itself. God opens your heart to hear the “Good News” What St. Paul means is that it is the authenticity of the witness that matters, not necessarily the standing of the person. When someone testifies to us of their experience of God, we believe because we sense in their witness a reality that goes beyond that particular person. If we do not find God in what they say, for example if we sense they are preaching themselves, not Jesus, then we walk away unconvinced.

St. Paul asks the Corinthians and us as well to encounter and know the Risen Christ for ourselves: to know Him and in this way to believe for ourselves.

Beheading of the Venerable Head of the Glorious Prophet, Forerunner and Baptist John

The divine Baptist, the Prophet born of a Prophet, the seal of all the Prophets and beginning of the Apostles, the mediator between the Old and New Covenants, the voice of one crying in the wilderness, the God-sent Messenger of the incarnate Messiah, the forerunner of Christ’s coming into the world (Esaias 40: 3; Mal. 3: 1); who by many miracles was both conceived and born; who was filled with the Holy Spirit while yet in his mother’s womb; who came forth like another Elias the Zealot, whose life in the wilderness and divine zeal for God’s Law he imitated: this divine Prophet, after he had preached the baptism of repentance according to God’s command; had taught men of low rank and high how they must order their lives; had admonished those whom he baptized and had filled them with the fear of God, teaching them that no one is able to escape the wrath to come if he do not works worthy of repentance; had, through such preaching, prepared their hearts to receive the evangelical teachings of the Savior; and finally, after he had pointed out to the people the very Savior, and said, “Behold the Lamb of God, Which taketh away the sin of the world” (Luke 3:2-18; John 1: 29-36), after all this, John sealed with his own blood the truth of his words and was made a sacred victim for the divine Law at the hands of a transgressor.

This was Herod Antipas, the Tetrarch of Galilee, the son of Herod the Great. This man had a lawful wife, the daughter of Arethas (or Aretas), the King of Arabia (that is, Arabia Petraea, which had the famous Nabatean stone city of Petra as its capital. This is the Aretas mentioned by Saint Paul in II Cor. 11:32). Without any cause, and against every commandment of the Law, he put her away and took to himself Herodias, the wife of his deceased brother Philip, to whom Herodias had borne a daughter, Salome. He would not desist from this unlawful union even when John, the preacher of repentance, the bold and austere accuser of the lawless, censured him and told him, “It is not lawful for thee to have thy brother’s wife” (Mark 6: 18). Thus Herod, besides his other unholy acts, added yet this, that he apprehended John and shut him in prison; and perhaps he would have killed him straightway, had he not feared the people, who had extreme reverence for John. Certainly, in the beginning, he himself had great reverence for this just and holy man. But finally, being pierced with the sting of a mad lust for the woman Herodias, he laid his defiled hands on the teacher of purity on the very day he was celebrating his birthday. When Salome, Herodias’ daughter, had danced in order to please him and those who were supping with him, he promised her — with an oath more foolish than any foolishness — that he would give her anything she asked, even unto the half of his kingdom. And she, consulting with her mother, straightway asked for the head of John the Baptist in a charger. Hence this transgressor of the Law, preferring his lawless oath above the precepts of the Law, fulfilled this godless promise and filled his loathsome banquet with the blood of the Prophet. So it was that that all-venerable head, revered by the Angels, was given as a prize for an abominable dance, and became the plaything of the dissolute daughter of a debauched mother. As for the body of the divine Baptist, it was taken up by his disciples and placed in a tomb (Mark 6: 21 – 29). Concerning the finding of his holy head, see February 24 and May 25.

Ted Kennedy RIP

When I go to bed at night I usually listen to Dan Rea on WBZ radio. I like to listen to what other are speaking about on the radio to get an idea of what the hot topics are. Last night was like any other night. I went to bed and fell fast asleep. I awoke about 2:30 to the news that Senator Edward M Kennedy had died. This came as no shock to me as he has been sick for months and has been going down hill as of late. I now knew what my show was going to be about today.

As I prepared for the show the words of condolence started to come in from the White House and other places and other people on both sides of the political life in the US. I was struck by the outpouring of gracious words from people that had worked with and against Senator Kennedy during his 47 years of public service.

This is the direction I went in today. You don’t have to agree with his positions on some issues and Lord knows I did not agree but you have to salute 47 years of public service. His private life may have been a mess, and whose is not, but his public service is commendable. This is the Ted Kennedy we should remember.

The Kennedy family has shed blood for this country and given their lives to public service. He has been called the “lion of the Senate” and some have said that there was not a piece of legislation to help the poor that did not have his name on it. This was a man that did not need the money and by all accounts never lined his own pockets he did it just to serve. From a wealth privileged family no doubt but gave his life for what he thought was best.

Senator Kennedy will be missed by his family and friends and the legacy will continue. Before long the haters will come back out and there is a rumor that the health care bill will be named after him we shall wait and see. Haters you need not leave comments here as they will be deleted straight away!

Communion and the Flu

Laura has begun a discussion on her blog about receiving communion during the flu season. I disagree with her that the media is hyping this up. I will admit the media, of which I am part of by the way, did hype up the swine flu thing last winter but by all accounts it could be serious this year. That is not the intent of this post.

For some 2,000 years the Orthodox Church has distributed Communion from a common cup on a common spoon. Now some my think this gross but allow to explain first from a practical position and then a theological one.

Wine is used and the alcohol content is such that germs will not last. We also add hot, almost boiling water, to the chalice at the time of the mingling. These two things will help prevent the spread of the germs. Like I said for some 2,000 years this is the way it has been done even during the plague period in history communion was distributed this way.

Okay now from the theological. As Orthodox and Roman Catholics, we believe that the bread and wine become the actual Body and Blood of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. Jesus tells us in the Gospel to do this in remembrance of me. So in theological terms transubstantiation takes place and the gifts become holy. So the question I have is why would something that Jesus Himself is telling us to do, and the Holy Spirit comes upon to change, why would it make you sick? The only way you could possibly think this to be the case is if you do not believe it is the actual Body and Blood of Jesus Christ our Lord and Savior! Sorry to be so harsh and in your face but that is the truth! Jesus is not going to command us to do something that will make us sick, plain and simple.

Now we need to take precautions, yes. I wash the chalice, spoon and other communion implements after each Liturgy. We need to wash our hands on a regular basis, and like the little kids do we need to sneeze into our sleeve and not our hands and if we do we need to sanitize them. All good things.

This fall and winter the vaccine will be out for the flu as it is every year. The young and the old will be given fist chance to get the shot. I would recommend getting the shot as I say every year. This is a flu shot just like the flu shot you get every other year but it has the swine flu stuff, sorry for the technical terms there, in it.

Do not be afraid of communion, in fact it is in times like these that we should be receiving communion not staying away from it.

22 August ~ St. Maelrubha

An abbot and martyr, founder of Abercrossan, b. 642; d. 21 April, 722. He was descended from Niall, King of Ireland, on the side of his father Elganach. His rnother, Subtan, was a niece of St. Comgall the Great, of Bangor. St. Maelrubha was born in the county of Derry and was educated at Bangor. When he was in his thirtieth year he sailed from Ireland for Scotland, with a following of monks. For two years he travelled about, chiefly in Argyll, and founded about half-a dozen churches then settled at Abercrossan (Applecross), in the west of Ross. Here he built his chief church and monastery in the midst of the Pictish folk, and thence he set out on missionary journeys, westward to the islands Skye and Lewis, eastward to Forres and Keith, and northward to Loch Shinn, Durness, and Farr. It was on this last journey that he was martyred by Danish vikings, probably at Teampull, about nine miles up Strath-Naver from Farr, where he had built a cell. He was buried close to the River Naver, not far from his cell, and his grave is still marked by “a rough cross-marked stone”. The tradition, in the “Aberdeen Breviary”, that he was killed at Urquhart and buried at Abercrossan is probably a mistake arising from a confusion of Gaelic place-names.

This error had been copied by several later hagiologists, as has also the same writers’ confusion of St. Maelrubha with Sts. Rufus of Capua. Maelrubha was, after St. Columba, perhaps the most popular saint of the north-west of Scotland. At least twenty-one churches are dedicated to him, and Dean Reeves enumerates about forty forms of his name. His death occurred on 21 April, and his feast has always been kept in Ireland on this day; but in Scotland (probably owing to the confusion with Sts. Rufus) it was kept on 27 August. On 5 July, 1898, Pope Leo XIII restored his feast for the Church in Scotland, to be kept on 27 August.

error: Content is protected !!