The Doctor of Divinity will be awarded honoris causa in recognition of his contribution to the academic study of Eastern Orthodox theology and spirituality. A press release from the seminary states:
“Many Orthodox Christians may be unaware of Rowan Williams’s research and contribution to the field of Orthodox theology,” said Father John. “But he was a pioneer in this field, with outstanding breadth and depth. The subject of his own doctoral thesis, for instance, was the work of the great Orthodox theologian Vladimir Lossky, the first academic study of the émigré theologians. He has also written beautifully on the icons of the Theotokos and the Transfiguration, and, most recently, has published a highly regarded volume titled Dostoevsky: Language, Faith and Fiction. In recognition of his outstanding work and contribution to the study of Eastern Christianity, we are very pleased that he has accepted to deliver the 2010 annual Schmemann lecture.”
This has caused quite a bit of conversation on the Orthodox Web and I guess I am a little late coming to the party on this one. Fr. Patrick Reardon has written an open letter to Metr. Jonah of the OCA regarding this and rather than quote from the letter I will just link to it here. I respect Fr. Patrick and I also respect his opinion on this matter.
I guess in the analysis of the situation I have no problem with Archbishops Williams coming for the lecture. After all the lecture is an academic forum that is supposed to explore all avenues of theology. Academics by their very nature are supposed to create discussion and we are supposed to look at an issue from all sides not just one.
When I was in seminary I always found it useful to read theologians who held a counter opinion to the Orthodox. Not try and change my mind but help me solidify my own position. Sometimes it is easier to explain a concept coming from the counter position. Some of my classmates did not feel the same way and felt that only opinion needed was the Orthodox one. I respectfully disagree.
This brings us to the awarding of the degree. As has been stated elsewhere, seminaries are not just academic institutions. Seminaries form the future leaders of the church both men and women and seminaries need to stand for something.
Last summer Notre Dame University invited The President of the United States to deliver the commencement address. This was a scandal in the American Roman Catholic Church. Not just because of the speech but because they awarded the President an honorary degree. It is not uncommon for universities to award such degrees to people such as the President of Dr. Williams but again these are not simply secular academic institutions. Notre Dame, as one can imagine by the name, is a Roman Catholic University and the President holds opinions different from that of the Catholic Church.
I understand that the Seminary is awarding this degree for the large body of work that Archbishop Williams has completed on Eastern Theology. But, Archbishop Williams also holds positions that are counter to the life of the Orthodox Church and dare I say to the Anglican Church as well. I find it hard to swallow that the Seminary would award such a degree. Again, I support the lecture series and look forward to attending but I think we need to stop there.
Fr. Gregory Jensen has a discussion going on his blog that you might want to check out.
I welcome your comments but let us keep this civil.